FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   >>  
t sending station. The speech significance is now hidden in a current of a frequency intermediate between radio and audio. This current may be amplified many times and then supplied to the grid of a detector which obtains from it a current of audio-frequency which has a speech significance. In Fig. 128 I have indicated the several operations. We can now see why this method permits sharper tuning. The whole idea of tuning, of course, is to arrange that the incoming signal shall cause the largest possible current and at the same time to provide that any signals at other wave-lengths shall cause only negligible currents. What we want a receiving set to do is to distinguish between two signals which differ slightly in wave-length and to respond to only one of them. Suppose we set up a tuned circuit formed by a coil and a condenser and try it out for various frequencies of signals. You know how it will respond from our discussion in connection with the tuning curve of Fig. 51 of Letter 13. We might find from a number of such tests that the best we can expect any tuned circuit to do is to discriminate between signals which differ about ten percent in frequency, that is, to receive well the desired signal and to fail practically entirely to receive a signal of a frequency either ten percent higher or the same amount lower. For example, if the signal is at 30,000 cycles a tuned circuit might be expected to discriminate against an interfering signal of 33,000. If the signal is at 300,000 cycles a tuned circuit might discriminate against an interfering signal of 330,000 cycles, but an interference at 303,000 cycles would be very troublesome indeed. It couldn't be "tuned out" at all. Now suppose that the desired signal is at 300,000 cycles and that there is interference at 303,000 cycles. We provide a local oscillator of 270,000 cycles a second, receive by this "super-heterodyne" method which I have just described, and so obtain an intermediate frequency. In the output of the first detector we have then a current of 300,000--270,000 or 30,000 cycles due to the desired signal and also a current of 303,000--270,000 or 33,000 cycles due to the interference. Both these currents we can supply to another tuned circuit which is tuned for 30,000 cycles a second. It can receive the desired signal but it can discriminate against the interference because now the latter is ten percent "off the tune" of the signal. You see the questi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   >>  



Top keywords:
signal
 
cycles
 
current
 

frequency

 
circuit
 

signals

 
discriminate
 
interference
 

receive

 

desired


tuning

 
percent
 

currents

 

provide

 

differ

 
interfering
 

respond

 

detector

 

intermediate

 

significance


speech

 

method

 

amount

 

sending

 

higher

 

questi

 

suppose

 

practically

 
supply
 
obtain

output

 
heterodyne
 

troublesome

 

expected

 

couldn

 

oscillator

 

arrange

 

incoming

 

permits

 

sharper


largest

 
negligible
 

lengths

 

station

 

operations

 
amplified
 
hidden
 

supplied

 

obtains

 
receiving