FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  
haviour in the course of the evening that preceded the crime. It struck President Bonnet and shocked the priest. I also recall his hereditary antecedents, his mothers insanity, and finally----" Juve broke off abruptly and unceremoniously dragged the magistrate out of the room and into Charles Rambert's bedroom. He hurried into the dressing-room adjoining, went down on his knees on the floor, and laid a finger on the middle of the oil-cloth that was laid over the boards. "What do you see there, sir?" he demanded. The magistrate adjusted his eyeglass and, looking at the place indicated by the detective, saw a little black stain; he wetted his finger, rubbed it on the spot, and then, holding up his hand, observed that the tip of his finger was stained red. "It is blood," he muttered. "Yes, blood," said Juve, "and I gather from this that the story of the blood-stained towel which M. Rambert senior found among his son's things, and the sight of which so greatly impressed Mlle. Therese, was not an invention on that young lady's part, but really existed; and it forms the most damning evidence possible against the young man. He obviously washed his hands after the crime in the water from the tap over this wash-hand basin here, but one drop of blood falling on the towel and dripping on to the floor has been enough to give him away." The magistrate nodded. "It is conclusive," he said. "You have just proved to demonstration, M. Juve, that Charles Rambert is the guilty party. It is beyond argument. It is conclusive--conclusive!" There were a couple of seconds of silence, and then Juve suddenly said "No!" "No!" he repeated; "it is quite true that we can adduce perfectly logical arguments to show that the murder was committed by some member of the household and that, therefore, Charles Rambert is the only possible culprit; but we can adduce equally logical arguments to show that the crime was committed by some person who got in from outside: there is nothing to prove that he did not walk into the house through the front door." "The door was locked," said the magistrate. "That's nothing," said Juve with a laugh. "Don't forget that there isn't such a thing as a real safety lock nowadays--since all locks can be opened with an outside key. If I had found one of the good old-fashioned catch locks on the door, such as they used to make years ago, I should have said to you: nobody got in, because the only way to get thr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73  
74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

magistrate

 

Rambert

 

conclusive

 

Charles

 

finger

 

stained

 

committed

 

adduce

 

arguments

 
logical

member
 
antecedents
 

murder

 
hereditary
 

recall

 
household
 
culprit
 

shocked

 

Bonnet

 

priest


mothers

 

equally

 
person
 
perfectly
 

argument

 

couple

 

proved

 

demonstration

 

guilty

 

seconds


silence

 

finally

 

suddenly

 

abruptly

 

repeated

 

insanity

 

fashioned

 
opened
 

haviour

 

struck


preceded

 

locked

 
President
 

forget

 

nowadays

 

safety

 
evening
 
nodded
 

muttered

 
middle