FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
then, a privilege, (I always prefer to put it rather as a privilege than a duty), for us, who are to be as lights in the world, as ensamples to our flocks, to take a high stand in this matter, and show that we will deny ourselves that which has so insidiously worked the ruin of millions, that so we may perhaps win poor fallen creatures, fallen through drink, to come out of their miserable slough by crying to them, not merely `Come out,' but `Come out and follow us!'" Mr Oldfield did not answer; but Sir Thomas, turning to the rector, said,-- "I am sure this subject is deeply interesting to both you and myself, on our dear Frank's account. You know my views on the subject of total abstinence. Still I feel that there may be exceptional cases, where its adoption may be wise, and I could imagine that his might be such a case." "I heartily agree with you," replied Mr Oliphant. "Oh no, my dear," exclaimed Lady Oldfield; "I am quite sure total abstinence would never suit poor Frank; his constitution would not bear it; I appeal to you, Dr Portman, is it not so?" "I am quite of your ladyship's opinion," said the doctor. "You hear what Dr Portman says," cried her ladyship, turning to the rector. "I do," was the reply; "but that does not alter my conviction. Medical men's views have greatly changed of late years on this subject. Excuse me, Dr Portman, for thus differing from you." "Really," interposed Mr Oldfield, "I think you must allow the doctor to be the best judge of the medical side of the question. What would you say if the doctor on his part were to intrude on your province, and question your statements of scriptural truth from the pulpit?" "I should say," answered Mr Oliphant, "in the first place, that the two cases are essentially different. My statements are drawn from an inspired volume, from an express revelation; the opinions of medical men are simply the deductions of human reason and observation, and are therefore opinions which may be altered or modified. But, further, I should say that I never require my people to receive my statements from the pulpit without question or inquiry. I refer them always to the revelation, the inspired record, and bid them search that record for themselves. Now, if the doctor can point me to any inspired medical record which lays down a particular system, and declares directly or by fair inference against total abstinence, I will at once surrender my pres
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

doctor

 

abstinence

 
subject
 

inspired

 

record

 

Portman

 

Oldfield

 

medical

 

question

 
statements

revelation

 
rector
 
turning
 
Oliphant
 
ladyship
 

pulpit

 

opinions

 

privilege

 

fallen

 

directly


declares

 

system

 

intrude

 

Excuse

 

changed

 

greatly

 

differing

 

Really

 
province
 

surrender


interposed

 

inference

 

express

 

require

 
volume
 
people
 

inquiry

 
receive
 
modified
 

simply


deductions
 
observation
 

altered

 

answered

 

reason

 

scriptural

 

search

 

essentially

 

replied

 

creatures