FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
the man had not been trained in his task.' If Oliphant is correctly reported, he had been trained, but 'fainted.' 'Why bind the King with a garter?' In helpless pursuit of the forlorn idea of capturing him. 'Why execute the enterprise when the courtiers were passing the window?' Ruthven could not have known that they were coming at that moment; it was Gowrie's ill-timed falsehoods, to the effect that the King had ridden away, which brought them there. Gowrie had not allowed for Henderson's failure. 'How could the King struggle successfully with the stalwart Master?' He fought for his life, and Ruthven probably even then did not wish to injure him bodily. 'Why was not the Master made prisoner?' James answered this question when 'posed' by Mr. Bruce. His blood was up, and he said 'Strike!' 'The Earl likewise might, after he was stricken, have been preserved alive.' Perhaps--by miracle; he died instantly. The discrepancies as to the dagger and the opening of the window we have already treated, also the locking and unlocking, or leaving unlocked, of the chamber door, giving on the dark staircase, after Ruthven's last hurried entrance (p. 69). There follow arguments, to be later considered, about the relations between James and the Earl previous to the tragedy, and a statement, with no authority cited, that James had written to Gowrie's uncle, to meet him at Perth on August 5, implying that James had made up his mind to be there, and did not go on Ruthven's sudden invitation. 'The Earl and Cranstoun were alone with the four in the fatal chamber. The others who were wounded there went up after Gowrie's death.' It may be so, but the bulk of the evidence is on the other side. 'It is reported' that Henderson was eating an egg in the kitchen, and went into the town when the fray arose. It is also denied, on oath, by Gowrie's cook, who added that he was 'content to be hanged,' if it could be proved. {114} The Ruthven apologist (MS.) says that Henderson was waiting on the Lords who dined in the hall, and was _there_ when _the King's servant_ brought the news that the King had ridden away. 'The Master's sword, after his death, was found rusted tight in his scabbard.' The Master must have been a very untidy gallant. No authority is cited for the story. The Murrays (who were well rewarded) were in Perth, 'whether of set purpose let the reader judge.' By all means let the reader jud
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ruthven

 

Gowrie

 

Master

 
Henderson
 

reader

 

window

 

ridden

 

chamber

 
reported
 

brought


authority

 
trained
 

eating

 
wounded
 

evidence

 

August

 

statement

 
written
 

tragedy

 

previous


considered

 
relations
 

invitation

 

Cranstoun

 

sudden

 

implying

 
untidy
 

gallant

 
scabbard
 

rusted


Murrays

 

purpose

 

rewarded

 

servant

 
content
 
denied
 
kitchen
 

hanged

 

waiting

 

proved


apologist

 

dagger

 
allowed
 

failure

 

effect

 

falsehoods

 
struggle
 

successfully

 

injure

 

stalwart