FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   >>  
for the plaintiffs, and RUFUS CHOATE and GEO. WOOD for the defendants. On the part of the South it was claimed:--That the Fund was the property of those who received the benefit of it; of which they could not be deprived without clear proof of a breach of condition:--That there had been no forfeiture by the separation, because the General Conference, in the exercise of its legitimate authority, and for good and sufficient reasons, had assented to that division. They therefore ask that an equitable proportion of the capital, and of the profits of the Concern since 1845, should be awarded to them. On the part of the North it was claimed:--That the Fund was the property of the Methodist Episcopal Church, the beneficiaries receiving the profits of it merely by way of charity:--That the Southern Conferences seceded from and so form, at the present time, no part of the Church; since the General Conference had no power to authorize a separation; and, in fact, did not authorize it, their action being prospective, and accompanied by conditions which had not been complied with. And even had the separation been legitimate, a division of the property could only be claimed in virtue of a special agreement--sanctioned by a competent court; and there was, moreover, if the action of the General Conference was available, a special agreement as to the property in question, in virtue of which the plaintiffs can have no claim upon it. At the close of the arguments, the Court announced that it would not give its decision for some time; and advised the parties, in the mean while, to make an amicable adjustment of the matter; intimating that such an adjustment, if made, would receive the sanction of the Court. The defendants, therefore, made proposals to the plaintiffs to submit the matter to a legal arbitration, under the sanction of the Court; without, however, conceding any thing as to the question before the Court. The plaintiffs, meanwhile, before this offer was communicated to them, made similar overtures to the defendants. There is, therefore, every reason to hope for an amicable adjustment of this vexatious case. The General Assembly of the New School Presbyterian Church convened at Utica, May 15. Rev. ALBERT BARNES of Philadelphia was chosen Moderator by a unanimous vote. The chief topic of interest discussed was a plan for the extension of the distinctive principles of the denomination, especially at the West. A few petitions on th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   >>  



Top keywords:

General

 

property

 
plaintiffs
 

Church

 
claimed
 

Conference

 

adjustment

 
defendants
 

separation

 

profits


sanction

 

amicable

 

matter

 
question
 

agreement

 

special

 
authorize
 

action

 

division

 

virtue


legitimate
 

proposals

 
receive
 
interest
 

submit

 
conceding
 

arbitration

 

discussed

 

principles

 

denomination


advised

 

distinctive

 

intimating

 
decision
 

extension

 

parties

 

Moderator

 

convened

 

Presbyterian

 

School


Assembly

 

chosen

 
petitions
 

BARNES

 

Philadelphia

 

vexatious

 

communicated

 

ALBERT

 

similar

 
overtures