FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  
ues raised in Quebec were manifold. Among them were the right of private judgment, the authority of canon law in the province, civil or ecclesiastical control over marriage, clerical immunity from the {29} jurisdiction of civil courts, and the degree of intervention which was permissible to the clergy in elections. The first question, that of the right of private judgment, concerned the future leader of Canadian Liberalism and became acute in connection with the _Institut Canadien_ of Montreal. This was a literary and scientific society, founded in 1844 by some members of the same group who later organized the _Rouge_ party. It supplied the want of a public library and reading-room in Montreal, and a hundred branches sprang up throughout the province. The _Institut_ soon fell under the suspicion of a section of the clergy. It was declared by Bishop Bourget that immoral or heretical books which had been put on the _Index_ were contained in the library. Rival societies were founded under the auspices of the Church and many of the members of the _Institut_ were induced to secede. Nevertheless young Laurier joined the _Institut_ shortly after coming to Montreal. In 1863 he was one of a committee of four who endeavoured in vain to induce Bishop Bourget to specify what books were under the ban, and in 1865 and 1866 he was a vice-president of the society. Like his associates, he was {30} placed in a difficult position by the bishop's unyielding attitude, for he did not wish to quarrel with his Church. So far as he was concerned, however, his removal to Arthabaskaville in 1866 ended the episode. The remaining members of the _Institut_ struggled on until 1868, when they published a _Year-Book_ containing an address by Mr L. A. Dessaules, president of the _Institut_, commending toleration.[1] A nice question of interpretation followed. Mr Dessaules asserted that he meant to urge personal toleration and good-will. Bishop Bourget contended that the address meant dogmatic toleration or indifference, the attitude that one creed was as good as another. In spite of an appeal to Rome by Joseph Doutre the work was placed on the _Index_, and the announcement followed that members who persisted in adhering to the _Institut_ would be refused the sacraments of the Church. After this blow the _Institut_ {31} dwindled away and in time disappeared entirely. Meanwhile Mr Laurier's weekly newspaper at Arthabaskaville, _Le De
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Institut

 
members
 
Bishop
 

Church

 

toleration

 

Montreal

 

Bourget

 

concerned

 
Arthabaskaville
 

library


address
 
Dessaules
 

society

 

founded

 

question

 

judgment

 

private

 
attitude
 

province

 

Laurier


clergy

 
president
 
difficult
 

published

 

position

 

associates

 
struggled
 

quarrel

 

removal

 

episode


bishop

 

unyielding

 

remaining

 

sacraments

 

refused

 

persisted

 

adhering

 

dwindled

 
newspaper
 

weekly


Meanwhile

 

disappeared

 

announcement

 
interpretation
 
asserted
 
personal
 

commending

 

contended

 

appeal

 

Joseph