FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >>  
ern sciolists, repudiated design in nature. Voltaire, treating upon Spinosism, says: "I am aware that various philosophers, and especially Lucretius, have denied final causes. I am also aware that Lucretius, though not very chaste, is a very great poet in his descriptions and in his morals; but in philosophy I own he appears to me to be very far behind a college porter or a parish beadle. To affirm that the eye is not made to see, nor the ear to hear, nor the stomach to digest, is not this the most revolting folly that ever entered the human mind? Doubter as I am, this _insanity_ seems to me _evident_, and _I say so_. For my part, I see in nature, as in the arts, only final causes; and I believe that an apple tree is made to bear apples, as I believe that a watch is made to tell the hour." Voltaire charges Warburton with calumniating Cicero, by saying that Cicero said, "It is unworthy of the majesty of the empire to adore one only God." Voltaire's words are these: "Warburton, like his contemporaries, has calumniated Cicero and ancient Rome." He then gives the above quotation, along with a short comment in Cicero's defense, and closes with the following words: "It is then quite false that Cicero, or any other Roman, ever said that it did not become the majesty of the empire to acknowledge a Supreme God. Their Jupiter, the Zeus of the Greeks, the Jehovah of the Phoenicians, was always considered as the master of the secondary gods. This great truth can not be too forcibly inculcated." Voltaire was a Deist. Lucretius, according to Voltaire, denied design in nature. Voltaire said, in philosophy, he was very far behind a college porter or a parish beadle. Spinosa was a Pantheist. Voltaire says, "He frequently contradicted himself; that he had not always clear ideas; that he sometimes clung to one plank, sometimes to another." Voltaire says: "A natural philosopher of some reputation had no doubt that this 'Needham,' who made the eels, 'was a profound Atheist,' who concluded that since eels could be made of rye meal, men might be made of wheat flour; that nature and chemistry produce all; and that it was demonstrated we may very well dispense with an all forming God." Voltaire calls this _an unparalleled blunder_. D'Holbach, the author of the "System de la Nature," was an Atheist, so were his assistants in the production of that work. Voltaire addresses the author of that work in the following words: "In the state of do
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   >>  



Top keywords:

Voltaire

 
Cicero
 

nature

 
Lucretius
 

Warburton

 

Atheist

 
author
 

empire

 

majesty

 

college


porter

 
denied
 

philosophy

 

design

 

beadle

 

parish

 

Needham

 
Spinosism
 

natural

 

reputation


philosopher

 

contradicted

 

secondary

 

master

 

considered

 
Phoenicians
 
philosophers
 

Pantheist

 
frequently
 

Spinosa


forcibly
 

inculcated

 

sciolists

 

System

 
Holbach
 

unparalleled

 

blunder

 

Nature

 
addresses
 

assistants


production

 
forming
 

dispense

 

profound

 

concluded

 
Jehovah
 

demonstrated

 
repudiated
 

chemistry

 

produce