FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  
lished in _Archaeologia Oeliana_, vol. ii. (1832), p. 171. W.C. TREVELYAN. Wallington. _Minar's Book of Antiquities_ (Vol. i., p. 277.; ii. p. 344.).--I am much obliged to T.J. for his endeavours to help me to Minar's _Book of Antiquities_. But there still remains a chasm too wide for me to jump; inasmuch as Christopher Meiners published his treatise _De Vero Deo_ in 1780, and Cardinal Cusa, who refers to Minar, died in 1464, being more than 300 years before. A.N. _Croziers and Pastoral Staves_ (Vol. ii., pp. 248, 313.).--The opinion expressed by the REV. MR. WALCOT (in your No. 50.), that by the word _crozier_ is to be understood the crossed staff belonging only to archbishops and legates, while the staff with a crook at its end is to be called the pastoral staff, cannot, I think, be considered satisfactory, for the following, among other reasons. Crozier is generally (I should formerly have said universally) understood to mean the staff with a crook, the so well-known "ensign of bishops." In the instances mentioned by MR. WALCOT, _croziers_ are repeatedly spoken of as having been borne at the funerals of _bishops_, while the crosses borne before Wolsey are called crosses, and not croziers. The word _crozier_ seems to be derived from the mediaeval Latin word _crocia_. This is explained by Ducange: "Pedum, baculus pastoralis, episcopalis." Crocia seems to be derived from, or closely connected with, "crocha, uncinus, lamus," and "crochum, uncus quo arcubalistae tenduntur" (Ducange). Hence it appears that _crozier_ does not refer to a cross but to a crook. In such ancient authorities as I have had the opportunity of referring to at the moment, as brasses, incised slabs, &c., bishops and archbishops are alike represented with the crooked staff; a cross is of more rare occurrence, and at the moment only two instances occur to me, one in the fine brass of Frederic, son of Casimir, king of Poland, and a cardinal, which is in the cathedral of Cracow, and in which he is represented holding a crozier, while crosses are figured on the sides under the cardinal's hat. The other is in the curious brass of Lambert, bishop of Bamberg, in the cathedral of that city: in this the bishop holds a cross in his right and a crozier in his left hand. The statement that the crook of the bishop's staff was bent outwards, and that of the abbot's inward, is one which is often made in books; I should, however, be very glad to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  



Top keywords:

crozier

 
bishop
 

crosses

 
bishops
 

archbishops

 

moment

 
instances
 

called

 

derived

 

cardinal


cathedral

 
Ducange
 

croziers

 

WALCOT

 

understood

 

represented

 

Antiquities

 
appears
 

crocha

 

baculus


pastoralis

 

episcopalis

 

Crocia

 

explained

 

mediaeval

 
crocia
 
closely
 

arcubalistae

 
tenduntur
 

crochum


connected
 

uncinus

 

Bamberg

 

Lambert

 
curious
 

statement

 

outwards

 

figured

 
incised
 

brasses


crooked

 
referring
 

opportunity

 

ancient

 

authorities

 
occurrence
 

Poland

 
Cracow
 

holding

 

Casimir