FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
hanged. The courts uniformly hold that an immaterial alteration should be treated as no alteration and therefore does not avoid the instrument. Altering words in the instrument without changing the legal sense or altering immaterial words is an immaterial alteration. Retracing a faded name with ink, or tracing a word with ink written with pencil, is immaterial. Alterations and additions in deeds are immaterial where neither the rights or duties, interests or obligations, of either of the parties to the instrument are in any manner changed or affected. A promissory note made payable to a partnership under a certain name was altered by the maker and the payee without the knowledge of the surety so as to be payable to the same parties under another name and the court held it to be immaterial. But the effect of the correction must be that it makes the instrument conform to the intention of the parties concerned, nor must they alter the legal sense of the instrument. Memoranda made on the margin of the note for the convenience of the holder and merely explanatory of some circumstances connected with the note are immaterial. The erasure of words immaterial to the legal sense of the instrument or inserted by mistake, is also immaterial. Where an alteration is in itself immaterial it will not void an instrument even though made with fraudulent intent. In Missouri it has been held that any alteration material or immaterial, made fraudulently or innocently, avoids a note in the hands of one who made the alteration. But in a later Missouri case, it is held, that the addition of the signature of a married woman without a separate estate to a note already issued was a nullity and without legal effect and therefore to be considered as no alteration and not to discharge the original parties. CHAPTER V HOW TO WRITE A CHECK TO PREVENT FORGING How a Paying Teller Determines the Amount of a Check--Written Amount and Amount in Figures Conflict--Depositor Protected by Paying Teller--Chief Concern of Drawer of a Check--Transposing Figures--Writing a Check That Cannot Be Raised--Writers Who Are Easy Marks for Forgers--Safeguards for Those Who Write Checks--An Example of Raised Checks--Payable "To Bearer" is Always a Menace--Paying Teller and an Endorsement System Must Be Observed in Writing Checks--How a Check Must Be Written to Be Absolutely Safe--A Signature that Cannot Be Tampered with Without Detection--Payi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
immaterial
 

instrument

 

alteration

 

parties

 

Paying

 

Checks

 
Amount
 

Teller

 

Written

 
effect

Missouri

 

Cannot

 

Writing

 

payable

 
Figures
 

Raised

 

original

 
CHAPTER
 

Without

 

discharge


considered

 

nullity

 
Detection
 

FORGING

 

PREVENT

 

issued

 
innocently
 

avoids

 
addition
 
estate

separate

 

signature

 

married

 

Tampered

 

Example

 

Payable

 

Bearer

 

Forgers

 

Writers

 
Safeguards

fraudulently
 

Transposing

 

Always

 

System

 
Endorsement
 

Observed

 

Absolutely

 
Determines
 

Menace

 

Conflict