issatisfaction was the violation of a promise, but what title had he
to claim this promise, or to exact its fulfilment, if the escheat
belonged as of right to Scindiah? Again, when I came to this country,
I found that he was walking pretty smartly into a parcel of people in
Central India who were getting up a little rebellion on their own
account, a tempest in a teapot, not against us, but against their own
native rulers. In this instance he interfered, no doubt, as head
policeman and conservator of the peace of all India. But observe, if
we lay down the rule that we will scrupulously respect the right of
the chiefs to do wrong, and resolutely suppress all attempts of their
subjects to redress their wrongs by violence, which, in the absence of
help from us, is the only redress open to them, we may find perhaps
that it may carry us somewhat far--possibly to annexation--the very
bugbear from which we are seeking to escape. Holkar, for instance,
unless common fame traduces him, has rather an itching for what Mr.
Laing calls 'hard rupees.' His subjects and dependents have decided,
and not altogether unintelligible, objections to certain methods which
he adopts for indulging this propensity. When they--those of them more
especially who have Treaty claims to our protection, come to us to
complain, and to ask our help--are we to say to them:--'We have too
much respect for Holkar's independence to interfere. Bight or wrong
you had better book up, for we are bound to keep the peace, and we
shall certainly be down upon you if you kick up a row'? In the
anomalous position which we occupy in India, it is surely necessary to
propound with caution doctrines which, logically applied, land us in
such dilemmas.

[Sidenote: Problems for a time of peace.]

At a future time, if I live, and remain here, it is possible that I
may take the liberty of submitting to you some views of my own on
these questions. It may perhaps turn out that a time of peace is
better fitted than one of revolution for the discovery of the true
theory according to which our relations with native States ought to be
conducted; or, it may be, for the discovery that no theory can be
framed sufficiently elastic to fit all those relations and the
complications which arise out of them, and that, after all, we must in
a great measure rely o