FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251  
252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   >>   >|  
l velvet coats and satin small-clothes from Mr. Filby's, which are more famous than the finest garments ever worn by prince or peer. Who does not remember that bloom-colored coat which the ablest painters have studiously immortalized, made by John Filby, at the Harrow, in Water Lane (best advertised of tailors!), and that charming blue velvet suit, which Mr. Filby was never paid for? Surely a poet so splendid was fit for the career of fashion! No, Oliver Goldsmith's velvet and lace were the expression of a deep and painful sense of personal unfitness. They were the fine frame which is intended to pass off an awkward and imperfect picture. There was a quieter dignity in Johnson's threadbare sleeves. Johnson, the most influential though not the most elegant intellect of his time, is grander in his neglect of fashion than Goldsmith in his ruinous subservience. And if it were permitted to me to speak of two or three great geniuses who adorn the age in which we ourselves are living, I might add that they seem to follow the example of the author of "Rasselas" rather than that of Mr. Filby's illustrious customer. They remind me of a good old squire who, from a fine sentiment of duty, permitted the village artist to do his worst upon him, and incurred thereby this withering observation from his metropolitan tailor: "You are _covered_, sir, but you are _not_ dressed!" LETTER IV. TO A YOUNG GENTLEMAN WHO LIVED MUCH IN FASHIONABLE SOCIETY. Test of professions--Mobility of fashionable taste--Practical service of an external deference to culture--Incompatibility between fashionable and intellectual lives--What each has to offer. Your polite, almost diplomatic answer to my letter about fashionable society may be not unfairly concentrated into some such paragraph as the following:-- "What grounds have I for concluding that the professed tastes and opinions of Society are in any degree insincere? May not society be quite sincere in the preferences which it professes, and are not the preferences themselves almost always creditable to the good taste and really advanced culture of the Society which I suspect of a certain degree of affectation?" This is the sense of your letter, and in reply to it I give you a simple but sure test. Is the professed opinion carried out in practice, when there are fair opportunities for practice? Let us go so far as to examine a particular instance. Your friends profess to appreciate
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251  
252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

fashionable

 

velvet

 
preferences
 

culture

 

fashion

 

Society

 

Goldsmith

 

permitted

 

degree

 

professed


society

 
Johnson
 
letter
 

practice

 
LETTER
 
metropolitan
 

intellectual

 

observation

 

answer

 

diplomatic


polite

 

withering

 

FASHIONABLE

 

SOCIETY

 

GENTLEMAN

 

professions

 

deference

 

dressed

 

Incompatibility

 
external

service

 

Mobility

 
Practical
 

covered

 

tailor

 
grounds
 

opinion

 
carried
 

simple

 
instance

friends

 

profess

 

examine

 
opportunities
 

affectation

 

paragraph

 
concluding
 

tastes

 

unfairly

 
concentrated