FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   >>   >|  
that these met together, the word used, verse 6, _they came together_, evidenceth, and verse 25. For the churches of Syria and Cilicia not sending their commissioners, it follows not that because _they are not named_, therefore _they were not there_; and if _they were not there_, therefore _they ought not to have been_: but it is rather thought Syria and Cilicia had commissioners there, in regard the synodal decrees are directed to them as well as others, and the decrees bound them, which they could not do as formal Scripture; for the words, _it seemeth good to us_, and their submitting the matter to disputation, argue the contrary; therefore as synodal decrees, which inasmuch as they bound those churches, they either were present, or were obliged to be present by their commissioners. 3. To that exception, that the multitude of believers had voices there, and therefore it is not one of our synods, ver. 22-- We answer, it can nowise be proved that every particular believer had a suffrage in the assembly. Eminent divines[116] understand by _multitude_ and _church_, the multitude and whole church of apostles and elders, who are said to be _gathered together_, verse 6, _to consider of the matter_; besides which no other multitude is said to be gathered together, while the matter was in debate; yet we shall not deny even to other members the liberty of their consent and approbation, and freedom to examine all determinations by the rule of God's word: but the ordaining and forming those decrees is here evinced to be by the apostles and elders, when as they are called _their decrees_, Acts xvi. 4,6. 3. Those only had definitive votes, who met together synodically to consider of the question; but they were only the apostles and elders, Acts xv. 6. That the epistle is sent in the name of all, is granted; because it was sent by common consent, and withal thereby was added some more weight to the message. 4. Further, if the believers of Jerusalem voted in that assembly, by what authority was it? How could they _impose a burden_ upon, and command decrees unto the churches of Syria and Cilicia, and other churches, who, according to our brethren's opinion, were not only absent in their commissioners, but independent in their power? To the exception, that other synods may not pretend to the privileges of that, since its decrees were indited by the Holy Ghost; and therefore no pattern for our imitation-- _Ans_. The decre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246  
247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
decrees
 

multitude

 

commissioners

 

churches

 

elders

 

apostles

 

Cilicia

 

matter

 

exception

 
present

assembly

 

gathered

 

consent

 

synods

 

church

 

believers

 

synodal

 
epistle
 
withal
 
granted

common

 

evinced

 

forming

 

ordaining

 

called

 

weight

 

synodically

 

definitive

 
question
 

Jerusalem


privileges
 
pretend
 

indited

 
imitation
 
pattern
 
independent
 

absent

 

authority

 
Further
 
impose

burden
 

brethren

 

opinion

 
command
 
message
 

approbation

 

regard

 

directed

 

voices

 

answer