FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361  
362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   >>   >|  
tely occupy, in groups of high relief, the sides of that pedestal, symbolizing, by their established merits and cooperative works, the grandeur of the researches and resulting discoveries of their leader and chief, who was the first to announce and to demonstrate to a despairing world, by actual mechanical agencies, the practicability of; an electro-magnetic telegraph through any distances. Much more of the same flatulent bombast follows which it will not be necessary to introduce here. While Morse himself naturally felt some delicacy in noticing such an attack as this, he found a willing, and efficient champion in his old friend (and the friend of Henry as well) Professor Leonard D. Gale, who writes to him on January 22, 1872:-- "I have lately seen a mean, unfair, and villainous letter of F.O.J. Smith, addressed to H.J. Rogers (officer of the Morse Monumental Association), alleging that the place on the monument designed to be occupied by the statue of Morse, should be awarded to Henry; that Morse was not a scientific man, etc., etc. It was written in his own peculiar style. The allegations were so outrageous that I felt it my duty to reply to it without delay. As Smith's letter was to Rogers, as an officer of the Association, I sent my reply to the same person. I enclose a copy herewith. "Mrs. Gale suggests an additional figure to the group on the monument--a serpent with the face of F.O.J.S., biting the heel of Morse, but with the fangs extracted." Professor Gale's letter to Henry J. Rogers is worthy of being quoted in full:-- "I have just read a letter from F.O.J. Smith, dated December 11, 1871, addressed to you, and designed to throw discredit on Morse's invention of the Telegraph, the burden of which seems to be rebuke to the designer of the monument, for elevating Morse to the apex of the monument and claiming for Professor J. Henry, of the Smithsonian Institution, that high distinction. "The first question of an impartial inquirer is: 'To which of these gentlemen is the honor due?' To ascertain this we will ask a second question: 'Was the subject of the invention a _machine_, or was it _a new fact in science_?' The answer is: 'It was a _machine_.' The first was Morse's, the latter was Henry's. Henry stated that electric currents might be sent through long distances applicable to telegraphic purposes. Morse took the facts as they then existed, invented a machine, harnessed the steed therein, and set
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361  
362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 

monument

 
Rogers
 

machine

 

Professor

 
addressed
 
friend
 
invention
 

question

 

designed


Association
 

distances

 

officer

 
serpent
 
enclose
 
December
 
additional
 

person

 

figure

 
extracted

herewith

 

worthy

 

suggests

 

quoted

 

biting

 
claiming
 

currents

 

electric

 

applicable

 

stated


science

 

answer

 
telegraphic
 

purposes

 

harnessed

 

invented

 

existed

 
subject
 

elevating

 

designer


Smithsonian

 

Institution

 

rebuke

 

discredit

 

Telegraph

 
burden
 
distinction
 

impartial

 

ascertain

 

inquirer