through group union and cooperation. When either group, however, seeks
to further its own interest at the expense of the welfare of the whole
society, as in securing class legislation, achieving monopolies, holding
efficient workers to the level of production of the slowest and least
capable of the group, then the class or group spirit becomes an evil
that must be fought for the good of all.
It is exactly the same with the nation. Its interest is justly served
only in harmony with the welfare of humanity. Any current problem will
illustrate the principle, as, for instance, that of immigration.
Certainly the nation has the right to prohibit immigration which
produces unassimilated plague-spots and threatens to cause racial
deterioration, as in phases of Oriental immigration to the Pacific
coast. Similarly, it is right to restrict immigration that would
further economic prosperity, at the expense of the manhood of the
nation. We must answer the question, whether we want factories or men.
It is desirable to have some of both, of course, but when one is to be
obtained at the expense of the other, it is manhood that must be the
deciding end.
On the other hand, when it comes to refusing a refuge to the poor and
oppressed, who are physically and morally acceptable, but lack a small
amount of money, or are unable to respond to a literary test, then the
welfare of humanity demands the opposite decision. Better give them the
fifty dollars--a healthy slave was worth more than that in the old days.
So teach them to read and write. The nation, can readily pay the small
economic price and accept the incidental difficulties for the sake of
the larger end.
Thus the deciding principle must always be the welfare, happiness,
growth, intelligence, helpfulness of each individual in harmony with all
others. Humanity is incarnatein each man. While, therefore, the
individual must dedicate and, at times, sacrifice himself, it is for the
sake, not of the state, church or other institution, but for the welfare
of all--_Man for Mankind_.
From so many sources the view finds expression that modern life has been
"weakened by humanitarianism." If there is truth in the view, we would
better take account of it and radically revise our ethical philosophy.
If it is false, it is a damning error, the reiteration of which tends to
undermine all that has been achieved for the spirit.
An interesting comment on the view is the fact that, i
|