FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219  
220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   >>   >|  
ough natural selection; and as this sterility follows the same general laws in the vegetable as in the animal kingdom, it is improbable, though apparently possible, that with plants crossed species should have been rendered sterile by a different process. From this consideration, and remembering that species which have never co-existed in the same country, and which therefore could not have received any advantage from having been rendered mutually infertile, yet are generally sterile when crossed; and bearing in mind that in reciprocal crosses between the same two species there is sometimes the widest difference in their sterility, we must give up the belief that natural selection has come into play. As species have not been rendered mutually infertile through the accumulative action of natural selection, and as we may safely conclude, from the previous as well as from other and more general considerations, that they have not been endowed through an act of creation with this quality, we must infer that it has arisen incidentally during their slow formation in connection with other and unknown changes in their organisation. By a quality arising incidentally, I refer to such cases as different species of animals and plants being differently affected by poisons to which they are not naturally exposed; and this difference in susceptibility is clearly incidental on other and unknown differences in their organisation. So again the capacity in different kinds of trees to be grafted on each other, or on a third species, differs much, and is of no advantage to these trees, but is incidental on structural or functional differences in their woody tissues. We need not feel surprise at sterility incidentally resulting from crosses between distinct species,--the modified descendants of a common progenitor,--when we bear in mind how easily the reproductive system is affected by various causes--often by extremely slight changes in the conditions of life, by too close interbreeding, and by other agencies. It is well to bear in mind such cases, as that of the _Passiflora alata_, which recovered its self-fertility from {189} being grafted on a distinct species--the cases of plants which normally or abnormally are self-impotent, but can readily be fertilised by the pollen of a distinct species--and lastly the cases of individual domesticated animals which evince towards each other sexual incompatibility. * * * *
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219  
220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
species
 

rendered

 

distinct

 
incidentally
 
sterility
 
natural
 

selection

 

plants

 

difference

 

incidental


differences
 
animals
 

organisation

 

unknown

 

quality

 

affected

 

grafted

 

crosses

 

advantage

 

mutually


sterile
 

crossed

 

general

 
infertile
 

impotent

 
abnormally
 
differs
 

structural

 

functional

 

fertilised


capacity

 

incompatibility

 
sexual
 
evince
 

domesticated

 
pollen
 

fertility

 

lastly

 

conditions

 

individual


readily

 

easily

 
slight
 

agencies

 
progenitor
 
reproductive
 

system

 

extremely

 
interbreeding
 

common