FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279  
280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   >>  
portion of 19 to 12-1/2 the whole of the newer Palaeozoic formations. Lastly, after giving these examples, Darwin adds the important consideration, that "in many regions the metamorphic and granitic rocks would be found much more widely extended than they appear to be, if all the sedimentary beds were removed which rest unconformably on them, and which could not have formed part of the original mantle under which they were crystallized." The above is a brief condensation of the already condensed statement which Darwin has given of the imperfection of the geological record; but I think it is enough to show, in a general way, how precarious must be the nature of any objections to the theory of evolution which are founded merely upon the silence of palaeontology in cases where, if the record were anything like complete, we should be entitled to expect from it some positive information. But, as we have seen in the text, imperfect though the record be, in as far as it furnishes positive information at all, this is well-nigh uniformly in favour of the theory; and therefore, even on grounds of palaeontology alone, it appears to me that Darwin is much too liberal where he concludes his discussion by saying,--"Those who believe that the geological record is in any degree perfect, will undoubtedly at once reject the theory." If in any measure reasonable, such persons ought rather to examine their title to such a belief; and even if they disregard the consensus of testimony which is yielded by all the biological sciences to the theory of evolution, they ought at least to hold their judgment in suspense until they shall have not only set against the apparently negative testimony which is yielded by geology its unquestionably positive testimony, but also well considered the causes which may--or rather must--have so gravely impaired the geological record. However, be this as it may, I will now pass on to consider the difficulties and objections which have been brought against the theory on grounds of palaeontology. These may be classified under four heads. First, the absence of varietal links between allied species; second, the sudden appearance of whole groups of species--not only as genera and families, but even sometimes as orders and classes--without any forms leading up to them; third, the occurrence of highly organized types at much lower levels of geological strata than an evolutionist would antecedently expect; and, four
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279  
280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   >>  



Top keywords:

record

 

theory

 
geological
 

palaeontology

 
testimony
 

positive

 

Darwin

 
grounds
 

yielded

 

evolution


objections

 

expect

 

species

 
information
 

perfect

 

degree

 
examine
 

suspense

 

persons

 

biological


disregard
 

consensus

 
reasonable
 
measure
 

sciences

 
apparently
 

judgment

 

belief

 

reject

 

undoubtedly


impaired

 

orders

 

classes

 
families
 

genera

 

sudden

 

appearance

 

groups

 

leading

 

strata


levels

 

evolutionist

 
antecedently
 

occurrence

 

highly

 

organized

 

allied

 

gravely

 

However

 
considered