FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169  
170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   >>  
only we must restrict intellect to the comparing or interlacing of single perceptions.' But man transcends in his mental powers the barriers of the brute intellect at a point which coincides with the starting-point of language. And in this coincidence Professor Mueller endeavors to find a sufficiently fundamental explanation of the problem of the origin of language. In reference to this point of coincidence, he quotes Locke as saying that, 'the having of general ideas is that which puts a perfect distinction betwixt man and brutes, and is an excellency which the faculties of brutes do by no means attain to,' and then adds: 'If Locke is right in considering the having of general ideas as the distinguishing feature between man and brutes, and, if we ourselves are right in pointing to language as the one palpable distinction between the two, it would seem to follow that language is the outward sign and realization of that inward faculty which is called the faculty of abstraction, but which is better known to us by the homely name of reason. 'Let us now look back to the result of former lectures. It was this: After we had explained everything in the growth of language that can be explained, there remained in the end, as the only inexplicable residuum, what we called _roots_. These roots formed the constituent elements of all languages.... What, then, are these roots?' Two theories have been started to solve this problem: the Onomatopoetic, according to which roots are imitations of sounds; and the Interjectional, which regards them as involuntary ejaculations. Having discussed these theories, and taken the position that, although there are roots in every language which are respectively imitations of sounds and involuntary exclamations, it is, nevertheless, impossible to regard any considerable number of roots, and much less, all roots, as originating from these sources, the distinguished Philologist announces as the true theory, that every root 'expresses a general, not an individual, idea;' just the opposite of what he deems would be the case if the Onomatopoetic and Interjectional theories explained the origin of speech. Some paragraphs are then devoted to the examination of the merits of a controversy which has existed among philosophers as to 'whether language originated in general appellations, or in proper names. It is the question
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169  
170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   >>  



Top keywords:
language
 

general

 

theories

 
explained
 

brutes

 

distinction

 

called

 

imitations

 

Onomatopoetic

 

sounds


Interjectional

 
involuntary
 

faculty

 
coincidence
 
origin
 

problem

 

intellect

 

position

 

discussed

 

ejaculations


Having

 

regard

 

considerable

 

impossible

 

exclamations

 
comparing
 

languages

 

single

 

perceptions

 

elements


formed

 

constituent

 
interlacing
 

number

 

restrict

 

started

 

originating

 

merits

 

controversy

 

examination


devoted
 
speech
 

paragraphs

 

existed

 

proper

 
question
 

appellations

 
originated
 
philosophers
 

distinguished