FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  
, he says, of making the pictures appear to stand out unnaturally; that is to say, if the cameras were to be placed 12 inches apart (which would be equal to 1 in 8), the pictures would seem to be in greater relief than the objects. I find that the pictures on a French stereoscopic slide I have by me have been taken at an angle of 10 deg., or 1 in 6. This was evidently photographed at a considerable distance, the triumphal arch in the Place de Carousel (of which it is a representation) being reduced to about 11/4 inch in height. How comes it then that the angle is here increased to 10 deg. from 61/2 deg., or to 1 in 6 from 1 in 9. Moreover, the only work I have been able to obtain on the mode of taking stereoscopic pictures, lays it down that all portraits, or near objects, should be taken under an angle of 15 deg., or, as it says, 1 in 5; that is, if the camera is 20 feet from the sitter, the distance between its first and second position (supposing only one to be used) should not exceed 4 feet: otherwise, adds the author, "the stereosity will appear unnaturally great." When two cameras are employed, the instructions proceed to state that the distance between them would be about 1/10th of the distance from the part of the object focussed. The example given is a group of portraits, and the angle, 1 in 10, is afterwards spoken of as being equivalent to an arc of 10 deg. Farther on, we are told that "the angle should be lessened as the distance between the nearest and farthest objects increase. Example: if the farthest object be twice as far from the camera as the near object, the angle should be 5 deg. to a central point between these two. Now, I find by calculation that the measurements and the angle here mentioned by no means {506} agree. For instance, an angle of 15 deg. is spoken of as being equivalent to the measurement 1 in 5. An angle of 10 deg. is said, or implied, to be the same as 1 in 10. This is far from being the fact. According to my calculations, the following are the real equivalents:-- An angle of 15 deg. is equal to 1 in 4. " 12 deg. " 1 in 5. " 10 deg. " 1 in 6. " 6-1/2 deg. " 1 in 9. " 6 deg. " 1 in 10. " 5 deg. " 1 in 12. " 4 deg. " 1 in 15. Will any of your readers oblige me by solving the above anomalies, and by giving the proper angles or measurement u
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>  



Top keywords:
distance
 

pictures

 

objects

 
object
 

measurement

 

equivalent

 
spoken
 

camera

 

farthest

 
portraits

unnaturally

 

stereoscopic

 

cameras

 
lessened
 
increase
 

nearest

 

Example

 

making

 
central
 

focussed


calculation

 

Farther

 

readers

 

equivalents

 

oblige

 

solving

 

angles

 

proper

 

giving

 

anomalies


calculations

 

proceed

 
mentioned
 

instance

 

According

 
implied
 

measurements

 

French

 

increased

 

Moreover


relief

 

taking

 
obtain
 

height

 

triumphal

 
considerable
 

evidently

 
photographed
 
Carousel
 
reduced