FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   >>  
ng note by Sir C. Brydges:--"The extreme rarity of this publication renders a farther account desirable, and also more copious extracts. It appears wholly unknown to Herbert, and to all the biographers of Drayton." It is unnoticed by Ritson also. Chalmers, in his _Series of English Poets_, has referred to this communication, but he has not printed the poem amongst Drayton's works. The expression "a Flemish account" is probably not of very long standing, as it is not found in the most celebrated of our earlier dramatists, unless, indeed, Mrs. Page's remark on Falstaff's letter may be cited as an illustration:--"What an unweighed behaviour hath this Flemish drunkard _picked out of my conversation_, that he dares in this manner assay me." If the habit of drinking to excess prevailed in the Low Countries in the sixteenth century to the extent represented, may not the expression have arisen from that circumstance, and been equivalent to the contempt which is usually entertained for the loose or imperfect statements made by a tipsy or drunken man? When quoting opinions upon Burnet, we must not forget the brief but pregnant character which Burke has given of the Bishop's _History of his Own Times_. In his admirable speech at Bristol, previous to the election if 1780, Burke says, "Look into the History of Bishop Burnet; _he is a witness without exception_." Dr. Johnson was not so laudatory:--"Burnet is very entertaining. The style, indeed, is mere chit-chat. I do not believe that he intentionally lied; but he was so much prejudiced, that he took no pains to find out the truth." The reader may refer to Dr. Hickes's _Criticism_ (Atterbury's _Correspondence_, i. 492.). Calamy's expression is a significant, if not a very complimentary one, as regards Burnet's candour (_Life and Times_, i. 59.). I.H.M. Bath, Dec. 1849. _Viz., why the contracted form of Videlicet._ I shall be much obliged if any one of your readers can inform me of the _principle_ of the contraction viz. for videlicet, the letter _z_ not being at all a component part of the three final syllables in the full world. [Cross symbol] [Is not our correspondent a little mistaken in supposing that the last letter in "viz." as originally a letter z? Was it not one of the arbitrary marks of contraction used by the scribes of the middle ages, and being in form something like a "z," came to be represented by the early printers
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   >>  



Top keywords:

letter

 
Burnet
 
expression
 

contraction

 

Flemish

 

Bishop

 

History

 

represented

 
account
 

Drayton


printers
 
intentionally
 

arbitrary

 

previous

 

originally

 

reader

 

prejudiced

 
election
 

witness

 

exception


laudatory

 
entertaining
 
middle
 

scribes

 

Johnson

 

Atterbury

 
obliged
 

Videlicet

 

symbol

 

contracted


Bristol

 

readers

 

component

 

principle

 

syllables

 

inform

 

supposing

 

significant

 
complimentary
 

mistaken


Calamy

 

Criticism

 

videlicet

 
Correspondence
 
candour
 
correspondent
 

Hickes

 

standing

 

referred

 

communication