FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
t of 'jewels five words long,' set and arranged in phrases of that magical and unending beauty which the very greatest poets of the world command. His effect, even in description, is rather of mass than of detail. He does not attempt analysis in character, and only skirts passion. Although prodigal enough of incident, he is very careless of connected plot. But his great and abiding glory is that he revived the art, lost for centuries in England, of telling an interesting story in verse, of riveting the attention through thousands of lines of poetry neither didactic nor argumentative. And of his separate passages, his patches of description and incident, when the worst has been said of them, it will remain true that, in their own way and for their own purpose, they cannot be surpassed. The already noticed comparison of any of Scott's best verse-tales with _Christabel_, which they formally imitated to some extent, and with the _White Doe of Rylstone_, which followed them, will no doubt show that Coleridge and Wordsworth had access to mansions in the house of poetry where Scott is never seen. But in some respects even their best passages are not superior to his; and as tales, as romances, his are altogether superior to theirs. FOOTNOTES: [12] It is fair to him to say that he made no public complaints, and that when some gutter-scribbler in 1810 made charges of plagiarism from him against Scott, he furnished Southey with the means of clearing him from all share in the matter (_Lockhart_, iii. 293; Southey's _Life and Correspondence_, iii. 291). But there is a suspicion of fretfulness even in the Preface to _Christabel_; and the references to Scott's poetry (not to himself) in the _Table Talk_, etc., are almost uniformly disparaging. It is true that these last are not strictly evidence. [13] The objection taken to this word by precisians seems to ignore a useful distinction. The _antiquary_ is a collector; the _antiquarian_ a student or writer. The same person may be both; but he may not. [14] _Waverley_, chap. vi. It owes a little to Smollett's Introduction to _Humphry Clinker_, but as usual improves the loan greatly. [15] Inasmuch as he himself was secretary to the Commission which did away with it. [16] Taken from the name of his friend Morritt's place on the Greta. CHAPTER IV THE NOVELS, FROM _WAVERLEY_ TO _REDGAUNTLET_ In the opening introduction to the collected edition of the novels, Scott
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
poetry
 

Christabel

 

incident

 

Southey

 
passages
 
superior
 

description

 
strictly
 

objection

 

disparaging


uniformly

 

evidence

 
fretfulness
 

clearing

 
matter
 
furnished
 

charges

 

plagiarism

 
Lockhart
 

Preface


references

 

suspicion

 

Correspondence

 
collector
 

friend

 
Morritt
 

Inasmuch

 

secretary

 

Commission

 

CHAPTER


opening

 

introduction

 
collected
 

novels

 

edition

 

REDGAUNTLET

 
NOVELS
 
WAVERLEY
 

greatly

 

scribbler


antiquary

 

antiquarian

 

student

 

writer

 
distinction
 

precisians

 
ignore
 

person

 
Introduction
 

Smollett