FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636  
637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   >>   >|  
tors being ashamed of themselves, the Rev. John Marsh tried to defend himself and his coadjutors, but Mr. Greeley very summarily brushed his sophistry aside, and placed all the actors in that disgraceful farce in their true colors. _The New York Daily Tribune, Wednesday, May 18, 1853._ THE WORLD'S TEMPERANCE CONVENTION. _To the Editor of the New York Tribune:_ SIR:--Your "Inquirer," it appears to me, is bent on throwing firebrands into the temperance ranks, and the worst kind of firebrands, those of vile sectarianism. Will you permit me to answer and remark upon a few of his inquiries? 1. "Are there to be _two_ World's Conventions?" _Answer_. That will be, I suppose, as people please. There may be a dozen; and I know not that any harm will be done. 2. "Did Mayor Barstow occasion the schism in the temperance ranks, by refusing to recognize the feminine element in the movement?" _Ans_. No. The schism, such as there was, was caused by a proposal of Rev. Mr. Higginson, and a persistence in it, that a representative of the Women's State Society should be added to the Business Committee of one from each State; and this after the Committee was full. With as good reason, it was said, might one be pressed from the _Men's_ State Society or State Alliance. Mr. Higginson pertinaciously pressed the matter; and because he could not have his own way and rule the Convention, he refused to serve on the Committee; and hence arose all the disturbance and the schism. 3. "Did Dr. Hewitt rule out from office Mr. Barnum on the ground that he (Mr. Barnum) was an infidel?" _Ans_. No. I am confident he used no such phraseology; and "Inquirer" has no more right to ask such a question, than he has to ask if Dr. Hewitt did not rule him out on the ground that Mr. Barnum was a horse thief. The very question amounts to an assertion (as is announced in the next inquiry) that he _did_ say it; which, if he did not, is calumny. Dr. H. _did_ object to Mr. Barnum, as he had a perfect right to do, as one of the Appointing Committee. It was desirable to find the best men to get up to the World's Convention. I proposed Mr. Barnum as one, knowing his amazing efficiency. Dr. H. objected, on the ground that he (Barnum) was a very exceptionable m
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636  
637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Barnum

 
Committee
 

schism

 

ground

 
firebrands
 

Society

 
Higginson
 

Inquirer

 

pressed

 

Convention


Hewitt

 

temperance

 

Tribune

 

question

 

desirable

 

Alliance

 

matter

 
Appointing
 

Business

 

pertinaciously


reason
 

knowing

 
proposed
 
amazing
 

efficiency

 

exceptionable

 

objected

 

perfect

 
confident
 

infidel


assertion

 
announced
 

amounts

 

phraseology

 

office

 

inquiry

 

object

 

refused

 

calumny

 

disturbance


Barstow

 

Wednesday

 

colors

 

TEMPERANCE

 

appears

 
throwing
 

CONVENTION

 
Editor
 

defend

 

ashamed