FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  
and paralysing Russia within a few weeks: or that they are in a desperate plight and know it. As for the future, I think it would be a mistake to expect this war to produce a revolution in human nature and equally wrong to think nothing has been achieved if it doesn't. What I do hope is that it will mark a distinct stage towards a more Christian conception of international relations. I'm afraid that for a long time to come there will be those who will want to wage war and will have to be crushed with their own weapons. But I think this insane and devilish cult of war will be a thing of the past. War will only remain as an unpleasant means to an end. The next stage will be, one hopes, the gradual realisation that the ends for which one wages war are generally selfish: and anyway that law is preferable to force as a method of settling disputes. As to whether National ideals can be Christian ideals, in the strict sense they can't very well: because so large a part of the Christian ideal lies in self-suppression and self-denial which of course can only find its worth in individual conduct and its meaning in the belief that this life is but a preparation for a future life: whereas National life is a thing of this world and therefore the law of its being must be self-development and self-interest. The Prussians interpret this crudely as mere self-assertion and the will to power. The Christianising of international relations will be brought about by insisting on the contrary interpretation--that our highest self-development and interest is to be attained by respecting the interests and encouraging the development of others. The root fallacy to be eradicated of course, is that one Power's gain is another's loss; a fallacy which has dominated diplomacy and is the negation of law. I think we are perceptibly breaking away from it: the great obstacle to better thinking now is the existence of so many backward peoples incapable (as we think) of seeking their own salvation. Personally I don't see how we can expect the Christianising process to make decisive headway until the incapables are partitioned out among the capables. Meanwhile let us hope that each new war will be more unpopular and less respectable than the last. I'm afraid I haven't even the excuse of a day's fishing without any fish. Now for your letter of August 11th. I'm sorry you are discouraged because the programme you propounded to Auntie's work-party in Febru
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Christian
 

development

 

afraid

 

Christianising

 
relations
 
international
 

National

 
fallacy
 

ideals

 

interest


future

 

expect

 
eradicated
 

perceptibly

 
breaking
 
letter
 

negation

 

discouraged

 
August
 

diplomacy


dominated

 

Auntie

 

insisting

 
brought
 

assertion

 
contrary
 

interpretation

 

interests

 

programme

 

encouraging


respecting

 

attained

 
propounded
 

highest

 

obstacle

 

partitioned

 
capables
 
incapables
 

decisive

 

excuse


headway

 

Meanwhile

 

respectable

 

process

 
backward
 

existence

 
unpopular
 

thinking

 
peoples
 

incapable