FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  
gnes de 1814 et 1815, en France_. Vaudoncourt. _Essai sur l'Art Militaire, &c._ Carion-Nisas. _Histoire de l'Expedition en Russie en 1812_. Chambray. _War in Spain, Portugal, and the South of France_. John Jones. _Peninsular War_. Napier. _Notices of the War of 1812_. Armstrong All the above are works of merit; but none are more valuable to the military man than the military histories of Jomini and Kausler, with their splendid diagrams and maps.] CHAPTER III. FORTIFICATIONS. _Fortifications, or engineering_, may be considered with reference to the defence of states and the grand operation of armies; or with reference to the details of the construction, and attack, and defence of forts, and the influence of field-works on the tactical manoeuvres of armies. It is proposed to speak here only of its general character, as a branch of the military art, without entering into any professional discussion of details. The connection of fortification and strategy may be considered under two distinct heads: 1st, the choice of sites for constructing fortresses for defence; 2d, their influence in offensive operations, and the determination of the question whether they can be passed with safety, or whether the attacking force will be under the necessity of besieging them. The centre and extremities of _a base of operations_ should always be secured either by natural or artificial obstacles. This base is generally chosen so that fortifications will be necessary for strengthening only a part of the line. But if a frontier, like the side of France towards Belgium, be destitute of natural obstacles, the artificial means of defence must be proportionally increased. Great care should be taken that permanent fortifications be made only on such places as may favor military operations. If otherwise, the troops detached from the active army for garrisoning them, will only tend to weaken this force without any corresponding advantages. In this way, fortifications may become actually injurious to defence. A number of the European fortresses which were built before the subject of strategy was properly understood, are now regarded as utterly useless, from their ill-advised positions. Whether a fortress may be safely passed with merely blockading or observing it, depends very much upon the nature of the war, and the numbers and position of the defensive army. The allies, in 1814, invading France with a million of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68  
69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

defence

 

military

 
France
 

operations

 

fortifications

 
influence
 

armies

 

considered

 

natural

 

reference


obstacles
 

fortresses

 
passed
 

artificial

 

strategy

 

details

 

defensive

 
Belgium
 

frontier

 

Whether


proportionally

 
advised
 

increased

 

positions

 

position

 
destitute
 

fortress

 
generally
 
depends
 

nature


chosen
 

strengthening

 

safely

 

observing

 

blockading

 

weaken

 
subject
 

invading

 

advantages

 

European


allies

 

injurious

 

numbers

 
utterly
 
places
 

permanent

 

million

 

useless

 

regarded

 

active