FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>  
close of the session, when it became increasingly evident that a party split was impending, there were reports that Laurier proposed to make way for a successor upon some basis which might make an accommodation between the two wings of the party possible; and there was an attempt by a small group of Liberal M.P.'s to bring this about. The treatment of this incident in Professor Skelton's volume is obscure. In any case it had no significance and it came to nothing. Laurier alike by choice and necessity retained the leadership. Sir Wilfrid misjudged, all through the piece, the temper and purpose of the Liberals who dissented from his policy. For his own courses and actions there was a political reason; he looked for the political reasons behind the actions of those in disagreement with him. He found what he looked for, not in the actual facts of the situation but in his imagination. He saw conversion to the Round Table view of the Imperial problem and the acceptance of dictation from London--a very wild shot this! He saw political ambition. He saw unworthy desires to forward personal and business ends. But he did not see what was plain to view--that the whole movement was derived from an intense conviction on the part of growing numbers of Liberals that united national action was necessary if Canada was to make the maximum contribution to the war. There was very little feeling against Sir Wilfrid--rather a sympathetic understanding of the position in which he found himself; but they were wholly out of agreement with his view that Canada was in the war on a limited liability basis. In the very height of the controversy Sir Wilfrid could not be got to go beyond saying that Canada should make enquiries as to how many men she could afford to spare from her industries and these she should send if they could be induced voluntarily to enlist. This was wholly unsatisfactory to those who held that Canada was a principal in the war, and must shrink from no sacrifices to make victory possible. Still less satisfactory was the professed attitude of the Liberal candidates in Quebec; with few exceptions they embraced the anti-war Nationalist programme. It became only too evident that a Liberal victory would mean a government dependent upon and controlled by a Quebec bloc pretty thoroughly committed to the view that Canada had "done enough." For those committed to the prosecution of the war to the limit, conscription became a test an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>  



Top keywords:

Canada

 
Liberal
 
political
 

Wilfrid

 
looked
 
actions
 
Liberals
 

evident

 

victory

 

Laurier


Quebec
 

wholly

 

committed

 

united

 
understanding
 
sympathetic
 

enquiries

 

national

 

feeling

 
agreement

controversy
 

limited

 

height

 

maximum

 
contribution
 

position

 

liability

 
action
 

programme

 
Nationalist

exceptions
 

embraced

 

government

 

dependent

 

prosecution

 
conscription
 

controlled

 

pretty

 

candidates

 
attitude

induced

 

voluntarily

 

industries

 

afford

 
enlist
 

numbers

 

satisfactory

 
professed
 

sacrifices

 

shrink