FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   >>  
(though they did not entirely give up their loyalty to the Jerusalem Sanctuary), prepared the ground for the doctrines of such a Sect as the Zadokites in which all allegiance to Judah and Jerusalem was rejected, and in which the descendants of the House of Zadok (of whom indeed Onias himself was one) represented both the Priest and the Messiah. The evidence adduced in support of this ingenious hypothesis has already been examined in detail, and the results need only be summarized here: There is nothing in the book before us to warrant classing the men who made the new covenant in the land of Damascus as a Zadokite sect;(99) neither the external nor the internal evidence suffices to identify the work quoted by Kirkisani as Zadokite (by which he and all the rest understood Sadducean) with the book before us; the connection of the sect with the Dositheans rests in great part on misunderstanding of the testimonies about the Dositheans--misunderstandings, it is fair to say, which are not all original with Dr. Schechter,--in part upon points of resemblance which are not distinctive enough to prove anything. Of the peculiar organization of our sect, which would be conclusive, there is no trace anywhere. ------------------------------------- A much more sensational hypothesis was broached by Mr. G. Margoliouth in the _Athenaeum_ for November 26, 1910, under the title, "The Sadducean Christians of Damascus." He takes "the root" which God caused to spring from Israel and Aaron (1 7) for the same person who is subsequently called the Anointed one (Messiah), and distinguishes this figure from the Teacher of Righteousness, also called the Anointed one, who appeared twenty years later. "Both these Messiahs were dead when the document was composed, but they were both expected to reappear in the latter days." The first of them, the Messiah descended from Aaron and Israel, in consequence of whose work "they meditated over their sin, and knew that they were guilty men," is John the Baptist. John's father was a priest, and though his mother also is said to have been of priestly descent, "this need not stand in the way of believing that there was a strain of non-priestly Israelite blood in the family." The Sadducees would naturally prefer a priestly Messiah to a Davidic one, and, when John won the recognition of the people as a prophet sent by God, it would not be strange if a priestly pa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   >>  



Top keywords:

priestly

 
Messiah
 

called

 

Israel

 

Anointed

 

Dositheans

 
Sadducean
 

Damascus

 

Zadokite

 

Jerusalem


evidence

 

hypothesis

 

people

 
distinguishes
 
prophet
 

subsequently

 

person

 

recognition

 

prefer

 

appeared


Davidic
 

Righteousness

 
figure
 

Teacher

 
twenty
 
Christians
 

Margoliouth

 

Athenaeum

 

November

 
spring

strange
 
naturally
 
caused
 
meditated
 

consequence

 

descended

 

descent

 

priest

 

Baptist

 
guilty

mother

 

Israelite

 

family

 
father
 

Messiahs

 

document

 

composed

 
believing
 

strain

 

expected