FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458  
459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   >>   >|  
branch with no real fork or living bough to divide it or diminish it, the tapering is scarcely to be detected by the eye; and if we select a portion without such evidences of past ramification, there will be found none whatsoever. Sec. 4. And care of nature to conceal the parallelism. But nature takes great care and pains to conceal this uniformity in her boughs. They are perpetually parting with little sprays here and there, which steal away their substance cautiously, and where the eye does not perceive the theft, until, a little way above, it feels the loss; and in the upper parts of the tree, the ramifications take place so constantly and delicately, that the effect upon the eye is precisely the same as if the boughs actually tapered, except here and there, where some avaricious one, greedy of substance, runs on for two or three yards without parting with anything, and becomes ungraceful in so doing. Sec. 5. The degree of tapering which may be represented as continuous. Hence we see that although boughs may, and must be represented as actually tapering, they must only be so when they are sending off foliage and sprays, and when they are at such a distance that the particular forks and divisions cannot be evident to the eye; and farther, even in such circumstances the tapering never can be sudden or rapid. No bough ever, with appearance of smooth tapering, loses more than one tenth of its diameter in a length of ten diameters. Any greater diminution than this must be accounted for by visible ramification, and must take place by steps, at each fork. Sec. 6. The trees of Gaspar Poussin; And therefore we see at once that the stem of Gaspar Poussin's tall tree, on the right of the La Riccia, in the National Gallery, is a painting of a carrot or a parsnip, not of the trunk of a tree. For, being so near that every individual leaf is visible, we should not have seen, in nature, one branch or stem actually tapering. We should have received an _impression_ of graceful diminution; but we should have been able, on examination, to trace it joint by joint, fork by fork, into the thousand minor supports of the leaves. Gaspar Poussin's stem, on the contrary, only sends off four or five minor branches altogether, and both it and they taper violently, and without showing why or wherefore--without parting with a single twig--without showing one vestige of roughness or excrescence--and leaving, therefore, their unfo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458  
459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

tapering

 

parting

 

nature

 
Gaspar
 

boughs

 
Poussin
 

visible

 
diminution
 

substance

 
showing

represented

 
branch
 
conceal
 
ramification
 

sprays

 
excrescence
 

smooth

 

vestige

 

roughness

 
diameters

accounted

 

Riccia

 
leaving
 

diameter

 

greater

 

length

 

examination

 

appearance

 

impression

 

graceful


thousand

 

altogether

 

contrary

 
supports
 

leaves

 

received

 
single
 

parsnip

 
carrot
 

Gallery


painting

 
branches
 

violently

 
wherefore
 

individual

 

National

 
cautiously
 

perpetually

 

uniformity

 

perceive