atever hopes Banneker may have had of the magazine line suffered a
set-back when, a few days later, he called upon the Great Gaines at his
office, and was greeted with a cheery though quizzical smile.

"Yes; I've read it," said the editor at once, not waiting for the
question. "It's clever. It's amazingly clever."

"I'm glad you like it," replied Banneker, pleased but not surprised.

Mr. Gaines's expression became one of limpid innocence. "Like it? Did I
say I liked it?"

"No; you didn't say so."

"No. As a matter of fact I don't like it. Dear me, no! Not at all. Where
did you get the idea?" asked Mr. Gaines abruptly.

"The plot?"

"No; no. Not the plot. The plot is nothing. The idea of choosing such an
environment and doing the story in that way."

"From The New Era Magazine."

"I begin to see. You have been studying the magazine."

"Yes. Since I first had the idea of trying to write for it."

"Flattered, indeed!" said Mr. Gaines dryly. "And you modeled yourself
upon--what?"

"I wrote the type of story which the magazine runs to."

"Pardon me. You did not. You wrote, if you will forgive me, an imitation
of that type. Your story has everything that we strive for except
reality."

"You believe that I have deliberately copied--"

"A type, not a story. No; you are not a plagiarist, Mr. Banneker. But
you are very thoroughly a journalist."

"Coming from you that can hardly be accounted a compliment."

"Nor is it so intended. But I don't wish you to misconstrue me. You are
not a journalist in your style and method; it goes deeper than that. You
are a journalist in your--well, in your approach. 'What the public
wants.'"

Inwardly Banneker was raging. The incisive perception stung. But he
spoke lightly. "Doesn't The New Era want what its public wants?"

"My dear sir, in the words of a man who ought to have been an editor of
to-day, 'The public be damned!' What I looked to you for was not your
idea of what somebody else wanted you to write, but your expression of
what you yourself want to write. About hoboes. About railroad wrecks.
About cowmen or peddlers or waterside toughs or stage-door Johnnies, or
ward politicians, or school-teachers, or life. Not pink teas."

"I have read pink-tea stories in your magazine."

"Of course you have. Written by people who could see through the pink to
the primary colors underneath. When _you_ go to a pink tea, you are
pink. Did you ever go to one?"

Still thoroughly