FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  
sts; or rather, as, growing bolder when he has once pronounced his theory, he goes on to suggest to us, from one single head:-- Analogy would lead me one step further, namely, to the belief that ALL ANIMALS and PLANTS have descended from some one prototype. But analogy may be a deceitful guide. Nevertheless, all living things have much in common in their chemical composition, their germinal vesicles, their cellular structure, and their laws of growth and reproduction.... Therefore I shall infer from analogy that probably all the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth (man therefore of course included) have descended from some one primordial form into which life was first breathed by the Creator.--p. 484. This is the theory which really pervades the whole volume. Man, beast, creeping thing, and plant of the earth, are all the lineal and direct descendants of some one individual _ens_, whose various progeny have been simply modified by the action of natural and ascertainable conditions into the multiform aspect of life which we see around us. This is undoubtedly at first sight a somewhat startling conclusion to arrive at. To find that mosses, grasses, turnips, oaks, worms, and flies, mites and elephants, infusoria and whales, tadpoles of to-day and venerable saurians, truffles and men, are all equally the lineal descendants of the same aboriginal common ancestor, perhaps of the nucleated cell of some primaeval fungus, which alone possessed the distinguishing honour of being the "one primordial form into which life was first breathed by the Creator "--this, to say the least of it, is no common discovery--no very expected conclusion. But we are too loyal pupils of inductive philosophy to start back from any conclusion by reason of its strangeness. Newton's patient philosophy taught him to find in the falling apple the law which governs the silent movements of the stars in their courses; and if Mr. Darwin can with the same correctness of reasoning demonstrate to us our fungular descent, we shall dismiss our pride, and avow, with the characteristic humility of philosophy, our unsuspected cousinship with the mushrooms,-- Claim kindred there, and have our claim allowed, --only we shall ask leave to scrutinise carefully every step of the argument which has such an ending, and demur if at any point of it we are invited to substitute unlimited hypothesis for patient observation, or the spa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276  
277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

conclusion

 

philosophy

 
common
 

analogy

 
descendants
 

lineal

 

patient

 
breathed
 

primordial

 

descended


Creator

 

theory

 

inductive

 
Newton
 

strangeness

 

reason

 
aboriginal
 

equally

 

ancestor

 

nucleated


truffles
 

tadpoles

 
whales
 
venerable
 

saurians

 
primaeval
 

discovery

 

expected

 

fungus

 

possessed


distinguishing

 

honour

 

pupils

 
scrutinise
 

carefully

 

allowed

 

kindred

 

argument

 

hypothesis

 

unlimited


observation

 

substitute

 
invited
 

ending

 

mushrooms

 

cousinship

 

infusoria

 

movements

 

courses

 
Darwin