FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658  
659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   >>  
multiplication of the examples available for observation, and some 30 have already been discovered. Dr Alexander Roberts, of Lovedale in Cape Colony, truly remarks that the study of Algol variables "brings us to the very threshold of the question of stellar evolution." ("Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh", XXIV. Part II. (1902), page 73.) It is on this account that I propose to explain in some detail the conclusion to which he and some other observers have been led. Although these variable stars are mere points of light, it has been proved by means of the spectroscope that the law of gravitation holds good in the remotest regions of stellar space, and further it seems now to have become possible even to examine the shapes of stars by indirect methods, and thus to begin the study of their evolution. The chain of reasoning which I shall explain must of necessity be open to criticism, yet the explanation of the facts by the theory is so perfect that it is not easy to resist the conviction that we are travelling along the path of truth. The brightness of a star is specified by what is called its "magnitude." The average brightness of all the stars which can just be seen with the naked eye defines the sixth magnitude. A star which only gives two-fifths as much light is said to be of the seventh magnitude; while one which gives 2 1/2 times as much light is of the fifth magnitude, and successive multiplications or divisions by 2 1/2 define the lower or higher magnitudes. Negative magnitudes have clearly to be contemplated; thus Sirius is of magnitude minus 1.4, and the sun is of magnitude minus 26. The definition of magnitude is also extended to fractions; for example, the lights given by two candles which are placed at 100 feet and 100 feet 6 inches from the observer differ in brightness by one-hundredth of a magnitude. A great deal of thought has been devoted to the measurement of the brightness of stars, but I will only describe one of the methods used, that of the great astronomer Argelander. In the neighbourhood of the star under observation some half dozen standard stars are selected of known invariable magnitudes, some being brighter and some fainter than the star to be measured; so that these stars afford a visible scale of brightness. Suppose we number them in order of increasing brightness from 1 to 6; then the observer estimates that on a given night his star falls between stars 2 and 3, on the next night, say b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658  
659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   >>  



Top keywords:

magnitude

 
brightness
 

magnitudes

 

observer

 
explain
 

observation

 
methods
 

evolution

 

stellar

 

successive


multiplications

 

measured

 

Sirius

 

divisions

 

define

 

higher

 

contemplated

 
Negative
 

fainter

 

visible


number
 

defines

 
fifths
 
seventh
 

afford

 

Suppose

 

estimates

 

hundredth

 
differ
 

neighbourhood


Argelander

 
describe
 

astronomer

 

thought

 

devoted

 

measurement

 

standard

 

extended

 

fractions

 

definition


lights

 

selected

 

increasing

 

inches

 

invariable

 
candles
 

brighter

 
conviction
 

account

 

propose