FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>   >|  
case was urgent, and it was only thrown out because the Lord Mayor and Corporation of Dublin had not been consulted. Now it might have been very proper to consult these functionaries; it may even be a culpable omission to have neglected them; but this is not a time, nor is the House of Lords in circumstances, to be so fastidious and to stickle for such formalities. Their character with the nation is at stake, and it is of far greater consequence that they should do nothing calculated to throw suspicion on their motives, or odium on their proceedings, than to provide for a punctilious observance of respect and deference to the Dublin Corporation. They seem to me to have made a great mistake in throwing out this Bill, and I am much deceived if they do not hear more of it hereafter. September 8th, 1835 {p.310} Lord John called another meeting at the Foreign Office yesterday morning, when he proposed, and they agreed to take the Lords' amendments and finish the business; so this famous Corporation Bill has got through at last. O'Connell and Warburton concurred in accepting it. The only man who violently opposed its being accepted was Tom Duncombe, who made a furious harangue, and boldly asserted that _he knew_ to a positive certainty that if the Commons would hold out the Peers would abandon the justices and wards, and he offered _privately_ to give John Russell a list of Peers sufficient to carry this, and who, he would answer for it, were ready to make the concession. Lord John, however, was too wise to listen to such impudent nonsense, and, though very reluctantly, it was settled that the Commons should give way. Both parties probably overrate the value of the disputed clauses, and it is to be regretted that the two Houses will not part _amicably_. Government takes the Bill under a sort of engagement to consider it as an instalment, and that they shall try and get the difference next year. This is mere humbug, and a poor sop thrown to the Radicals, but as it answers the immediate purpose it is very well. September 9th, 1835 {p.311} [Page Head: THE KING'S HARANGUE ON THE MILITIA.] To-day at Court, when his Majesty made one of his most extraordinary harangues, and much more lengthy than usual. It was evidently got up with great care and previous determination. The last article on the Council list was one for the reduction of the militia, and it was upon this that he descanted with great vehemence. He gave
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Corporation

 

Dublin

 
thrown
 

September

 
Commons
 

Houses

 

regretted

 
engagement
 

clauses

 

Government


amicably

 

nonsense

 

concession

 
answer
 

offered

 

privately

 
Russell
 

sufficient

 

parties

 

overrate


settled
 

listen

 
impudent
 
reluctantly
 

disputed

 
answers
 

lengthy

 

harangues

 

evidently

 

extraordinary


MILITIA

 

Majesty

 

descanted

 
vehemence
 

militia

 

reduction

 

previous

 

determination

 

article

 

Council


HARANGUE

 

humbug

 
difference
 

instalment

 

Radicals

 

purpose

 

consequence

 

greater

 

calculated

 
formalities