FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136  
137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   >>   >|  
ne. If these valleys were attributed to their older occupiers we should therefore confine the name of the Rhone to the portion of its course from the Rhone glacier to Martigny. From Martigny it occupies successively the valleys of the Dranse, Guiers, Ain, and Saone. In fact, the Saone receives the Ain, the Ain the Guiers, the Guiers the Dranse, and the Dranse the Rhone. This is not a mere question of names, but also one of antiquity. The Saone, for instance, flowed past Lyons to the Mediterranean for ages before it was joined by the Rhone. In our nomenclature, however, the Rhone has swallowed up the others. This is the more curious because of the three great rivers which unite to form the lower Rhone, namely, the Saone, the Doubs, and the Rhone itself, the Saone brings for a large part of the year the greatest volume of water, and the Doubs has the longest course. Other similar cases might be mentioned. The Aar, for instance, is a somewhat larger river than the Rhine. [Illustration: Fig. 41.--Diagram in illustration of Mountain structure.] But why should the rivers, after running for a certain distance in the direction of the main axis, so often break away into lateral valleys? If the elevation of a chain of mountains be due to the causes suggested in p. 214, it is evident, though, so far as I am aware, stress has not hitherto been laid upon this, that the compression and consequent folding of the strata (Fig. 41) would not be in the direction _A B_ only, but also at right angles to it, in the direction _A C_, though the amount of folding might be much greater in one direction than in the other. Thus in the case of Switzerland, while the main folds run south-west by north-east, there would be others at right angles to the main axis. The complex structure of the Swiss mountains may be partly due to the coexistence of these two directions of pressure at right angles to one another. The presence of a fold so originating would often divert the river to a course more or less nearly at right angles to its original direction. Switzerland, moreover, slopes northwards from the Alps, so that the lowest part of the great Swiss plain is that along the foot of the Jura. Hence the main drainage runs along the line from Yverdun to Neuchatel, down the Zihl to Soleure, and then along the Aar to Waldshut: the Upper Aar, the Emmen, the Wiggern, the Suhr, the Wynen, the lower Reuss, the Sihl, and the Limmat, besides several smaller st
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136  
137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
direction
 

angles

 

Dranse

 
Guiers
 
valleys
 
instance
 

Switzerland

 

rivers

 

structure

 

Martigny


mountains
 
folding
 

hitherto

 

greater

 

amount

 

strata

 

compression

 

consequent

 

Soleure

 

Waldshut


Neuchatel
 

Yverdun

 

drainage

 
smaller
 

Limmat

 
Wiggern
 
pressure
 

presence

 

directions

 

complex


partly

 

coexistence

 
originating
 
divert
 

northwards

 
lowest
 

slopes

 

stress

 

original

 

joined


Mediterranean

 

flowed

 
nomenclature
 

swallowed

 
curious
 
antiquity
 

occupiers

 

confine

 
attributed
 

portion