FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191  
1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   >>   >|  
which they are to be governed, and if they are not to have opened to them all proper fields of labor, they will turn their attention to dressmaking, and to millinery, and to all the other hot-beds of our fast modern life. It is doing great harm; and that is one reason I earnestly plead in their behalf for the ballot. Men say women shall not have the ballot. They must petition and beg for it. Have not petitions been already made? Have not 200,000 names been sent in to Congress already? Then they say you must "organize;" and when that is done, and they find the country rocked as by a traveling volcano, they then say, "All women do not want to vote; all the women in the country should ask for it, and beg for it, and petition for it." Let me relate an incident that occurred in Boston at the office of Chief Justice Chapman, four or five weeks ago. A man, a guardian, came there with a writ of _habeas corpus_, which placed in his charge two children in no wise related to him, and he asked that he might have the control of the children, in opposition to the claim of their mother, who desired to keep them. The facts were briefly these: the woman had been happily married; her husband died and left her a widow with two young children. By the laws of the State of Massachusetts at that time, she was not allowed to be their guardian, nor the guardian of any body else's children. So the Judge of Probate appointed a guardian for the children, who magnanimously allowed them to remain in their mother's care. After two or three years she committed the unpardonable crime of marrying again, a thing that no man was ever guilty of. The marriage was perfectly acceptable to her former husband's relatives, but the guardian was so displeased with it, that he got out a writ of _habeas corpus_, and demanded of Chief Justice Chapman that the children be remanded to his custody. We are apt to boast of Massachusetts and its laws, but here was a case in which the Chief Justice, after hearing the case, actually remanded these children to the possession of that man. The court-room was crowded; the excitement was intense; the poor mother sank down in a deadly faint. I say such laws are an outrage upon womanhood, and they arise simply and solely from a deep contempt for womanho
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191  
1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

children

 

guardian

 
mother
 

Justice

 

country

 

Chapman

 

Massachusetts

 

allowed

 

remanded

 

husband


corpus

 

habeas

 

ballot

 

petition

 

committed

 

unpardonable

 
remain
 

perfectly

 

acceptable

 

marriage


guilty

 

magnanimously

 

marrying

 

attention

 
fields
 

relatives

 

Probate

 
proper
 

appointed

 
displeased

deadly
 
excitement
 

intense

 

outrage

 

contempt

 

womanho

 

solely

 
womanhood
 
simply
 

crowded


custody

 
demanded
 
possession
 

hearing

 

governed

 

opened

 
happily
 

relate

 

incident

 

earnestly