FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>   >|  
_ supplied the necessary contributions, while their superiors gained the credit attaching to those who fulfil the desires of the King. Under this system, the _raayat_ of course, possessed no rights, either of person or property. He was entirely in the hands of the Chiefs, was forced to labour unremittingly that others might profit by his toil; and neither his life, his land, his cattle, nor the very persons of his women-folk, could properly be said to belong to him, since all were at the mercy of any one who desired to take them from him, and was strong enough to do so. This, of course, is the weak point in the Feudal System, and was probably not confined to the peoples of Asia. The chroniclers of Mediaeval Europe tell only of Princes and Nobles, and Knights and Dames--and merry tales they are--but we are left to guess what was the condition of the bulk of the lower classes in Thirteenth-Century England. If we knew all, however, it is probable that their lot would prove to have been but little more fortunate than is that of the Malay _raayat_ of to-day, whose hardships and grievances, under native rule, move our modern souls to indignation and compassion. Therefore, we should be cautious how we apply our _fin de siecle_ standards to a people whose ideas of the fitness of things are much the same as those which prevailed in Europe some six centuries agone. [Footnote 1: _Raayat_ = Peasants, villagers.] [Footnote 2: _Penghulu_ = Headman.] Those who love to indulge in that pleasing but singularly useless pastime of imagining what might have been under certain impossible circumstances, will find occupation in speculating as to whether the Malays, had they remained free from all extraneous influence for another thousand years, would ever have succeeded in evolving a system of Government in any way resembling our own, out of a Feudal System which presents so curious a parallel to that from which our modern institutions have sprung. Would the Great Chiefs have ever combined to wrest a Magna Charta from an unwilling King, and the _raayat_ have succeeded in beating down the tyranny of their Chiefs? No answer can be given; but those who know the Malays best will find reason to doubt whether the energy of the race would ever, under any circumstances, have been sufficient to grapple with these great questions. The _raayat_ would have been content, I fancy, to plod on through the centuries 'without hope of change'; and,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

raayat

 

Chiefs

 

centuries

 

Footnote

 
circumstances
 

succeeded

 

Malays

 

Europe

 

system

 

modern


Feudal

 

System

 

useless

 
impossible
 
pastime
 
occupation
 

speculating

 

imagining

 

fitness

 

things


prevailed

 

people

 

supplied

 
siecle
 

standards

 

Headman

 
indulge
 
pleasing
 

Penghulu

 
remained

Raayat
 

Peasants

 
villagers
 

singularly

 
thousand
 

reason

 

energy

 
sufficient
 

tyranny

 

answer


grapple

 
change
 

questions

 

content

 
beating
 

Government

 

resembling

 

evolving

 
influence
 

extraneous