FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  
FOOTNOTES: [1] See note to Mr. Darwin, Historical Sketch, &c., 'Origin of Species, p. xiii. ed. 1876, and Arist. 'Physicae Auscultationes,' lib. ii. cap. viii. s. 2. [2] See Phaedo and Timaeus. [3] 'History of Creation,' vol. i. p. 18 (H. S. King and Co., 1876). [4] Ibid. p. 19. [5] 'History of Creation,' vol. i. p. 73 (H. S. King and Co., 1876). [6] 'Fortnightly Review,' new series, vol. xviii. p. 795. [7] 'Origin of Species,' p. 146, ed. 1876. [8] 'Origin of Species,' p. 146, ed. 1876. [9] Page 49. [10] 'Vie et Doctrine scientifique d'Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire,' by Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire. Paris, 1847, p. 344. [11] Address to the British Association, 1871. CHAPTER II THE TELEOLOGY OF PALEY AND THE THEOLOGIANS. Let us turn for a while to Paley, to whom Sir W. Thomson has referred us. His work should be so well known that an apology is almost due for quoting it, yet I think it likely that at least nine out of ten of my readers will (like myself till reminded of it by Sir W. Thomson's address) have forgotten its existence. "In crossing a heath," says Paley, "suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were asked how the stone came to be there; I might possibly answer that for anything I knew to the contrary, it had lain there for ever; nor would it perhaps be very easy to show the absurdity of this answer. But suppose I had found a _watch_ upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place; I should hardly think of the answer I had before given--that for anything I knew the watch might have been always there. Yet, why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? Why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz. that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone) that its several parts are framed and put together for a purpose, e. g. that they are so formed and adjusted as to produce motion, and that motion so regulated as to point out the hour of the day: that if the different parts had been differently shaped from what they are, of a different size from what they are, or placed after any other manner, or in any other order, than that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have been carried on in the machine, or none that would have answered the use which is now served by it. To reckon up a few o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

answer

 

Origin

 

Species

 

motion

 

Hilaire

 

Thomson

 
Geoffroy
 

suppose

 

Creation

 
History

reason

 

admissible

 

Auscultationes

 

inspect

 
perceive
 

Physicae

 
ground
 

inquired

 

absurdity

 

Phaedo


happened
 

discover

 

FOOTNOTES

 

carried

 

manner

 
machine
 

reckon

 

served

 

answered

 

Sketch


formed

 

purpose

 

framed

 

adjusted

 

produce

 
Darwin
 

differently

 
shaped
 

Historical

 

regulated


referred

 
apology
 

Review

 

series

 

Address

 

Doctrine

 
scientifique
 

Isidore

 
British
 
Association