s where you see
depravity. I don't say we're right; I only tell what you must often find
to be the fact, right or wrong, in talking with doctors. You see, too,
our notions of bodily and moral disease, or sin, are apt to go together.
We used to be as hard on sickness as you were on sin. We know better
now. We don't look at sickness as we used to, and try to poison it
with everything that is offensive, burnt toads and earth-worms and
viper-broth, and worse things than these. We know that disease has
something back of it which the body isn't to blame for, at least in most
cases, and which very often it is trying to get rid of. Just so with
sin. I will agree to take a hundred new-born babes of a certain stock
and return seventy-five of them in a dozen years true and honest, if not
'pious' children. And I will take another hundred, of a different stock,
and put them in the hands of certain Ann-Street or Five-Points teachers,
and seventy-five of them will be thieves and liars at the end of the
same dozen years. I have heard of an old character, Colonel Jaques, I
believe it was, a famous cattle-breeder, who used to say he could breed
to pretty much any pattern he wanted to. Well, we doctors see so much of
families, how the tricks of the blood keep breaking out, just as much in
character as they do in looks, that we can't help feeling as if a great
many people hadn't a fair chance to be what is called 'good,' and that
there isn't a text in the Bible better worth keeping always in mind than
that one, 'Judge not, that ye be not judged.'
"As for our getting any quarter at the hands of theologians, we don't
expect it, and have no right to. You don't give each other any quarter.
I have had two religious books sent me by friends within a week or
two. One is Mr. Brownson's; he is as fair and square as Euclid; a
real honest, strong thinker, and one that knows what he is talking
about,--for he has tried all sorts of religions, pretty much. He tells
us that the Roman Catholic Church is the one 'through which alone we can
hope for heaven.' The other is by a worthy Episcopal rector, who appears
to write as if he were in earnest, and he calls the Papacy the 'Devil's
Masterpiece,' and talks about the 'Satanic scheme' of that very Church
'through which alone,' as Mr. Brownson tells us, 'we can hope for
heaven.'
"What's the use in our caring about hard words after this,--'atheists,'
heretics, infidels, and the like? They're, after all, only
|