FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394  
395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   >>   >|  
f et Jarnac, etc., avec privilege (Cimber et Danjou, Archives curieuses, vi. 365, etc.); Discours de la bataille donnee par Monseigneur, Duc d'Anjou et de Bourbonnoys, ... contre les rebelles ... entre la ville d'Angoulesme et Jarnac, pres d'une maison nommee Vibrac appartenant a la Dame de Mezieres; an inaccurate official account, drawn up at Metz by Neufville on the first reception of the news, and sent by the Spanish ambassador, Alava, to Philip II.; La Mothe Fenelon, Corr. dip., vii. 3-11; Davila, bk. iv.; the "Relation originale" in Documents inedits tires des coll. MSS. de la bibliotheque royale (Fr. gov.), iv. 483, etc. Compare the excellent narratives of the Duc d'Aumale and Prof. Soldan. The Bulletin de la Soc. de l'hist. du prot. fr., i. (1853) 429, gives a representation of a monument, in the form of an obelisk, about eleven feet in height, erected by the Department of the Charente, in 1818, on the spot where Conde fell. A somewhat similar monument, raised in 1770 by the Count de Jarnac, was destroyed during the first French revolution. [667] Anjou to Charles IX., March 17, 1569, Duc d'Aumale, Les Princes de Conde, ii. 399. [668] Apostolicarum Pii Quinti, P. M., Epistolarum libri quinque. Antverpiae, 1640, 152. [669] Pii Quinti Epist., 157-166. [670] Ibid., 160, 161. [671] Boscheron des Portes, Hist. du Parlement de Bordeaux (Bordeaux, 1877), i. 214, 216. As the Huguenots were condemned, not for heresy, but for rebellion, sacrilege, etc., the learned author finds no mention of fagot and flame. [672] La Mothe Fenelon. i. 288-294. [673] Despatch of April 12, 1569, ibid., i. 303. [674] It is evident that the results of the battle were designedly exaggerated by the Roman Catholics at the time, and have been overrated ever since. Agrippa d'Aubigne alleges that, out of 128 cornets of cavalry in the Huguenot army, only fifteen were engaged; and that of over 200 ensigns of infantry, barely _six_--those under Pluviaut--came within a league of the battle-field. Hist. univ., _ubi supra_. [675] Jean de Serres, iii. 317, 318; De Thou, iv. (liv. xlv.) 178, 179. De Thou reckons the losses of the Roman Catholics before Cognac at more than 300 men. [676] De Thou, iv. 180, 181; Agrippa d'Aubigne, i. 282; J. de Serres, iii. 318, 319. [677] La Mothe Fenelon, i. 367. And now, to the insulting _quatrain_ already quoted a propos of Conde's death, the Huguenot soldiers of Angoumois replied in rough verses of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394  
395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Fenelon

 

Jarnac

 
Quinti
 

Agrippa

 

Serres

 

Bordeaux

 

Catholics

 

battle

 

monument

 

Aumale


Aubigne

 
Huguenot
 
evident
 

exaggerated

 
designedly
 

overrated

 

results

 

author

 

learned

 

mention


sacrilege

 

rebellion

 

condemned

 

Huguenots

 
heresy
 

Parlement

 
Portes
 

Boscheron

 

Despatch

 

infantry


losses

 
reckons
 

Cognac

 

soldiers

 

Angoumois

 
replied
 

verses

 
propos
 

insulting

 

quatrain


quoted

 

ensigns

 
barely
 

engaged

 

fifteen

 
cornets
 

cavalry

 
Pluviaut
 

league

 

alleges