h America Act, Monck failed to rise to the
occasion, owing to a sympathy with the views of the Manchester School.
To remain long enough in Canada to preside over the new Dominion had
been his own wish. But it does not appear that he utilized his
opportunities to marked advantage.
A unique political situation confronted Macdonald. It was natural to
suppose that, as the federation leaders belonged to both parties, the
first Cabinet should be composed of representative men of both. This
was the line Macdonald proposed to take. By this policy a strong
national party, with larger aims, would arise, and the old prejudices
and issues would be swept away. This statesmanlike conception involved
certain embarrassments, because the number of ambitious men looking for
Cabinet appointments would be increased and the expectations of
faithful Conservative supporters must suffer disappointment. These
problems, however, were not new to Macdonald. He had faced similar
dangers before, and his skill in handling them was equal to his
experience.
{141}
Meanwhile, Brown set himself to prevent a plan which would detach a
section of the Liberals from their former associates and permanently
range them under a Conservative leader. He cannot be blamed for this.
Confederation being now a fact, he considered himself under no
obligation to continue an alliance proposed for a special object.
Although Macdonald might be able to enlist the support of some maritime
Liberals, Brown strove to reunite his party in Ontario and present a
solid phalanx to the enemy.
A Liberal convention met in Toronto on the 27th and 28th of June 1867.
There was a good attendance, and impassioned appeals were made to men
of the party throughout the province to join in opposing any ministry
which Macdonald might form. It was generally understood that the three
Liberal ministers--Howland, McDougall, and Blair--were to continue in
the government, which would be renewed as a coalition with a certain
degree of Liberal support in the House. To strict party men this was
obnoxious. George Brown denounced any further coalition of parties:
If, sir, there is any large number of men in this assembly who will
record their votes {142} this night in favour of the degradation of the
public men of that party [the Liberals] by joining a coalition, I
neither want to be a leader nor a humble member of that party.
[Cheers.] If that is the reward you intend to give us all f
|