FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   >>  
greater or less according as the battle has been fought under more or less favourable circumstances, and according as it has been more or less obstinately contested. The battle of Jena and La Belle-Alliance show how impossible anything like a regular retreat may become, if the last man is used up against a powerful enemy. Now and again it has been suggested(*) to divide for the purpose of retreating, therefore to retreat in separate divisions or even eccentrically. Such a separation as is made merely for convenience, and along with which concentrated action continues possible and is kept in view, is not what we now refer to; any other kind is extremely dangerous, contrary to the nature of the thing, and therefore a great error. Every lost battle is a principle of weakness and disorganisation; and the first and immediate desideratum is to concentrate, and in concentration to recover order, courage, and confidence. The idea of harassing the enemy by separate corps on both flanks at the moment when he is following up his victory, is a perfect anomaly; a faint-hearted pedant might be overawed by his enemy in that manner, and for such a case it may answer; but where we are not sure of this failing in our opponent it is better let alone. If the strategic relations after a battle require that we should cover ourselves right and left by detachments, so much must be done, as from circumstances is unavoidable, but this fractioning must always be regarded as an evil, and we are seldom in a state to commence it the day after the battle itself. (*) Allusion is here made to the works of Lloyd Bullow and others. If Frederick the Great after the battle of Kollin,(*) and the raising of the siege of Prague retreated in three columns that was done not out of choice, but because the position of his forces, and the necessity of covering Saxony, left him no alternative, Buonaparte after the battle of Brienne,(**) sent Marmont back to the Aube, whilst he himself passed the Seine, and turned towards Troyes; but that this did not end in disaster, was solely owing to the circumstance that the Allies, instead of pursuing divided their forces in like manner, turning with the one part (Bluecher) towards the Marne, while with the other (Schwartzenberg), from fear of being too weak, they advanced with exaggerated caution. (*) June 19, 1757. (**) January 30, 1814. CHAPTER XIV. NIGHT FIGHTING THE manner of conducti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   >>  



Top keywords:

battle

 

manner

 
circumstances
 

separate

 
retreat
 

forces

 

covering

 
raising
 

necessity

 

Kollin


Frederick

 

Prague

 

columns

 
Bullow
 

choice

 

position

 
retreated
 

unavoidable

 

fractioning

 

detachments


regarded
 

Allusion

 
commence
 
seldom
 

Saxony

 
Marmont
 

advanced

 

exaggerated

 

Bluecher

 

Schwartzenberg


caution

 

FIGHTING

 

conducti

 
CHAPTER
 

January

 

turning

 

whilst

 

passed

 

require

 

alternative


Buonaparte

 

Brienne

 
turned
 

Troyes

 

Allies

 

pursuing

 

divided

 

circumstance

 

disaster

 
solely