FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   >>  
Talis decet partus Deum'--a birth of that kind is befitting to one who is God. We do not--no one ever did--believe Christ to be God because He was born of a Virgin; that is not the order of thought [and we have seen that it was certainly not the order of Apostolic preaching]; but we can recognize that if He was God, it was not unnatural for Him to be so born. No sound genuine historical criticism can deny that the Virgin-Birth was part of the Creed of Primitive Christianity, and that nothing that can be truly called science can object to that belief, unless it starts with the assumption, which, of course, it cannot even attempt to prove, that Christ was never more than man."* Similarly Professor Stanton: "The chief ground on which thoughtful Christian believers are ready to accept it [the miraculous Conception] is that, believing in the personal indissoluble union between God and man in Jesus Christ, the miraculous Birth of Jesus Christ is the only fitting accompaniment for this unions and, so to speak, the natural expression of it in the order of outward effects."+ -- * Guardian, November 19, 1902. + Stanton, Jewish and Christian Messiah p. 376. -- IV OUR LORD AS THE SECOND ADAM But we may surely go further than this, and say that, in regard to St. Paul, his language as to the Second Adam seems to necessitate the Virgin-Birth. In St. Paul's view there are, so to speak, only two men: "The first man is of the earth earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven" (1 Cor. xx. 47.)--a new starting-point for humanity. This doctrine of the Second Adam, of this fresh start given to the human race by Jesus Christ, would seem to require His Birth of a Virgin, for the Virgin-Birth is bound up with any really Catholic notion of the Incarnation. For what is the Catholic doctrine of Incarnation? Do we mean by Incarnation that on an already existing human being there descended in an extraordinary measure the Divine Spirit, so that He was by moral association so closely allied to God that He might be called God? Do we mean that some preminent saint, called Jesus, responded with such "signal readiness" to the Divine Voice, "and realized more worthily than any other man 'the Divine idea' of human excellence, so that to Him, by a laxity of phrase not free from profaneness, men might thus ascribe a so-called 'moral Divinity'"? Then, I say quite freely, if that is what we mean, that the Virgin-Birth is, so far as we can se
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   >>  



Top keywords:

Virgin

 

Christ

 
called
 
Incarnation
 
Divine
 

Stanton

 

Christian

 

Catholic

 

miraculous

 

Second


doctrine

 

excellence

 

heaven

 

starting

 

humanity

 
responded
 

earthy

 
readiness
 

necessitate

 
worthily

language

 

realized

 
signal
 

Spirit

 

association

 

notion

 

allied

 

closely

 

ascribe

 

descended


extraordinary

 
existing
 

profaneness

 

Divinity

 

laxity

 

measure

 

freely

 

phrase

 

require

 

preminent


Guardian

 

Primitive

 

criticism

 

historical

 

unnatural

 

genuine

 
Christianity
 
starts
 
assumption
 

belief