FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660  
661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   >>   >|  
r the commitment of a petition, without any intention of supporting the prayer of it. Mr. White (of Va.) would not have seconded the motion, if he had thought it would have brought on a lengthy debate. He conceived that a business of this kind ought to be decided without much discussion; it had constantly been the practice of the house, and he did not suppose there was any reason for a deviation. Mr. Page (of Va.) said, if the memorial had been presented by any individual, instead of the respectable body it was, he should have voted in favor of a commitment, because it was the duty of the legislature to attend to subjects brought before them by their constituents; if, upon inquiry, it was discovered to be improper to comply with the prayer of the petitioners, he would say so, and they would be satisfied. Mr. Stone (of Md.) thought the business ought to be left to take its usual course; by the rules of the house, it was expressly declared, that petitions, memorials, and other papers, addressed to the house, should not be debated or decided on the day they were first read. Mr. Baldwin (of Ga.) felt at a loss to account why precipitation was used on this occasion, contrary to the customary usage of the house; he had not heard a single reason advanced in favor of it. To be sure it was said the petitioners are a respectable body of men--he did not deny it--but, certainly, gentlemen did not suppose they were paying respect to them, or to the house, when they urged such a hasty procedure; anyhow it was contrary to his idea of respect, and the idea the house had always expressed, when they had important subjects under consideration; and, therefore, he should be against the motion. He was afraid that there was really a little volunteering in this business, as it had been termed by the gentleman from Georgia. Mr. Huntington (of Conn.) considered the petitioners as much disinterested as any person in the United States; he was persuaded they had an aversion to slavery; yet they were not singular in this, others had the same; and he hoped when congress took up the subject, they would go as far as possible to prohibit the evil complained of. But he thought that would better be done by considering it in the light of revenue. When the committee of the whole, on the finance business, came to the ways and means, it might properly be taken into consideration, without giving any ground for alarm. Mr. Tucker, (of S.C.) I have n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660  
661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
business
 

petitioners

 

thought

 

respect

 

reason

 

commitment

 
respectable
 

contrary

 

consideration

 

subjects


decided
 

prayer

 

brought

 
motion
 
suppose
 
ground
 

giving

 
gentleman
 

termed

 

volunteering


persuaded

 

States

 

considered

 

disinterested

 

Huntington

 
person
 

United

 
Georgia
 

procedure

 

paying


Tucker

 

afraid

 

expressed

 

important

 
revenue
 

gentlemen

 
committee
 

properly

 

finance

 

congress


slavery

 

singular

 

subject

 
complained
 

prohibit

 
aversion
 
constituents
 

attend

 
legislature
 
inquiry