the
stricken strike back again, and the result be a homicide, to put it at
the worst. But what then? Shall we the neighbours make it worse still?
Shall we think so poorly of each other as to suppose that the slain man
calls on us to revenge him, when we know that if he had been maimed, he
would, when in cold blood and able to weigh all the circumstances, have
forgiven his manner? Or will the death of the slayer bring the slain man
to life again and cure the unhappiness his loss has caused?"
"Yes," I said, "but consider, must not the safety of society be
safeguarded by some punishment?"
"There, neighbour!" said the old man, with some exultation "You have hit
the mark. That _punishment_ of which men used to talk so wisely and act
so foolishly, what was it but the expression of their fear? And they had
need to fear, since they--_i.e._, the rulers of society--were dwelling
like an armed band in a hostile country. But we who live amongst our
friends need neither fear nor punish. Surely if we, in dread of an
occasional rare homicide, an occasional rough blow, were solemnly and
legally to commit homicide and violence, we could only be a society of
ferocious cowards. Don't you think so, neighbour?"
"Yes, I do, when I come to think of it from that side," said I.
"Yet you must understand," said the old man, "that when any violence is
committed, we expect the transgressor to make any atonement possible to
him, and he himself expects it. But again, think if the destruction or
serious injury of a man momentarily overcome by wrath or folly can be any
atonement to the commonwealth? Surely it can only be an additional
injury to it."
Said I: "But suppose the man has a habit of violence,--kills a man a
year, for instance?"
"Such a thing is unknown," said he. "In a society where there is no
punishment to evade, no law to triumph over, remorse will certainly
follow transgression."
"And lesser outbreaks of violence," said I, "how do you deal with them?
for hitherto we have been talking of great tragedies, I suppose?"
Said Hammond: "If the ill-doer is not sick or mad (in which case he must
be restrained till his sickness or madness is cured) it is clear that
grief and humiliation must follow the ill-deed; and society in general
will make that pretty clear to the ill-doer if he should chance to be
dull to it; and again, some kind of atonement will follow,--at the least,
an open acknowledgement of the grief and hum
|