FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>  
y carried through safely by going farther into the hill. As to the angle of repose, Mr. Thomson seems to feel that its determination is so often impracticable that it is not to be relied on; and yet all calculations pertaining to earth pressure must be based on this factor. The writer believes that the angle of repose is not difficult to determine, and that observations of, and experiments on, exposed banks in similar material, and general experience in relation thereto, will enable one to determine it in nearly all cases within such reasonably accurate limits that only a small margin of safety need be added. Engineers are sent to Europe to study sewage disposal, water purification, transit problems, etc., but are rarely sent to an adjoining county or State to look at an exposed bank, which would perhaps solve a vexed problem in bracing and result in great economy in the design of permanent structures. Mr. Thomson's general views seem to indicate that much of the subject matter noted in the paper relates to unsolvable problems, for it appears that in many cases he believes the Engineer to be dependent on his educated guess, backed perhaps by the experienced guess of the foreman or practical man. The writer, on the contrary, believes that every problem relating to work of this class is capable of being solved, within reasonably accurate limits, and that the time is not far distant when the engineer, with his study of conditions, and samples of material before him, will be able to solve his earth pressure and earth resistance problems as accurately as the bridge engineer, with his knowledge of structural materials, solves bridge problems. The writer, in the course of his experience, has met with or been interested in the solution of many problems similar to the following: What difference in timbering should be made for a tunnel in ordinary, normally dry ground at a depth of 20 ft. to the roof, as compared with one at a depth of 90 ft.? What difference in timbering or in permanent design should be made for a horizontally-sheeted shaft, 5 ft. square, going to a depth of 45 ft. and one 25 by 70 ft., for instance, going to the same depth, assuming each to be braced and sheeted horizontally with independent bracing? What allowance should be made for the strength of interlock, assuming that a circular bulkhead of sand, 30 ft. in diameter, is to be carried by steel sheet-piling exposed around the outside for a dept
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>  



Top keywords:

problems

 

writer

 

believes

 
exposed
 
accurate
 

limits

 

engineer

 

sheeted

 
horizontally
 

permanent


bridge
 

timbering

 

difference

 

problem

 

experience

 

bracing

 

design

 

assuming

 
carried
 

Thomson


repose

 

determine

 

pressure

 

similar

 

general

 

material

 

resistance

 

samples

 

accurately

 

structural


knowledge

 

conditions

 
contrary
 

diameter

 

solved

 

capable

 

piling

 
relating
 
distant
 

ground


instance

 
ordinary
 

square

 

compared

 
tunnel
 
circular
 

bulkhead

 

solves

 

interested

 

interlock