FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   >>   >|  
, the most violent and summary, have the apparent disadvantage that we get by them,--two corners instead of one; much milder corners, however, and with a different light and shade between them; so that both methods are often very expedient. You may see the straight chamfer (_b_) on most lamp posts, and pillars at railway stations, it being the easiest to cut: the concave chamfer requires more care, and occurs generally in well-finished but simple architecture--very beautifully in the small arches of the Broletto of Como, Plate V.; and the straight chamfer in architecture of every kind, very constantly in Norman cornices and arches, as in Fig. 2, Plate IV., at Sens. Sec. IX. The third, or convex chamfer, as it is the gentlest mode of treatment, so (as in medicine and morals) it is very generally the best. For while the two other methods produce two corners instead of one, this gentle chamfer does verily get rid of the corner altogether, and substitutes a soft curve in its place. [Illustration: Fig. LIII.] But it has, in the form above given, this grave disadvantage, that it looks as if the corner had been rubbed or worn off, blunted by time and weather, and in want of sharpening again. A great deal often depends, and in such a case as this, everything depends, on the _Voluntariness_ of the ornament. The work of time is beautiful on surfaces, but not on edges intended to be sharp. Even if we needed them blunt, we should not like them blunt on compulsion; so, to show that the bluntness is our own ordaining, we will put a slight incised line to mark off the rounding, and show that it goes no farther than we choose. We shall thus have the section _a_, Fig. LIII.; and this mode of turning an angle is one of the very best ever invented. By enlarging and deepening the incision, we get in succession the forms _b_, _c_, _d_; and by describing a small equal arc on each of the sloping lines of these figures, we get _e_, _f_, _g_, _h_. Sec. X. I do not know whether these mouldings are called by architects chamfers or beads; but I think _bead_ a bad word for a continuous moulding, and the proper sense of the word chamfer is fixed by Spenser as descriptive not merely of truncation, but of trench or furrow:-- "Tho gin you, fond flies, the cold to scorn, And, crowing in pipes made of green corn, You thinken to be lords of the year; But eft when ye count you freed from fear, Comes the breme winter with chamfred b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

chamfer

 

corners

 

arches

 

depends

 
generally
 
architecture
 

methods

 

disadvantage

 

straight

 

corner


figures

 
incision
 

succession

 

sloping

 
describing
 

incised

 
rounding
 
slight
 
bluntness
 

ordaining


farther

 

invented

 
enlarging
 

turning

 

choose

 
section
 

deepening

 

thinken

 
crowing
 
winter

chamfred
 

furrow

 
called
 
mouldings
 

architects

 

chamfers

 

descriptive

 

Spenser

 
truncation
 

trench


continuous

 
moulding
 

proper

 

blunted

 

Broletto

 

beautifully

 

simple

 

occurs

 

finished

 

constantly