FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
was a middle aged man, with a kind, intellectual face. He spoke slowly and thoughtfully. When our hero entered he greeted him in a kindly way. "I am sorry to see you here, Fred," he began, "and I hope no evidence of guilt will be found against you. Though I feel a friendly interest in you, it is my duty, as you know, to decide the case impartially." "I know it is, judge," replied Fred, "and I think the evidence will prove my innocence." John Rexford now came in with his lawyer, Mr. Clarence Ham, a young man noted for his eloquence. Mr. Rexford was sworn as a witness, and deposed that he had strong grounds for believing his store was burned by an incendiary, and that he had reasons for suspecting Fred Worthington to be the guilty party, though he admitted that he had little or no real proof to sustain this belief. He gave his evidence upon the facts that led him to think the store was maliciously burned. Sheriff Coombs added his testimony upon this point. These facts, having been already given, need not be repeated. "This testimony gives no absolute proof that the store was burned by an incendiary," said the judge. "But I submit that the circumstances--the facts, if you please--lead to that conclusion," put in attorney Ham. "To be sure, they give rise to a strong suspicion that it was, but unless we get further testimony to this end, the court cannot hold the prisoner for trial." Mr. Rexford now gave his evidence, showing why he suspected Fred of being the guilty party. This being simply a hearing before a justice, Mr. Farrington was allowed to serve Fred in place of a lawyer. "You say," said Mr. Farrington, addressing the witness, "you thought at the time you discharged Fred Worthington from your employ that some sort of revenge would follow. Will you kindly state why you thought so?" "His manner indicated it." "In what way, please?" "He was very saucy and impudent." "In what manner was he impudent?" "He threatened me." "Simply because you informed him you wouldn't need his services longer?" "Well, yes, that is about it," answered the witness hesitatingly. "The court would like to know the exact facts," said Judge Plummer. "I shall endeavor to give them," answered the witness. "Then please state in what way he threatened you," said Mr. Farrington. "It was in his manner. I had to conciliate him to save trouble. I was absolutely afraid of him." "In what way did you conc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

evidence

 
witness
 

Rexford

 

manner

 

Farrington

 

testimony

 

burned

 

lawyer

 
impudent
 

guilty


threatened

 

strong

 

incendiary

 

thought

 

Worthington

 
answered
 

kindly

 

allowed

 
discharged
 

simply


addressing

 

hearing

 

suspected

 

showing

 
justice
 

prisoner

 

afraid

 

absolutely

 

hesitatingly

 

longer


endeavor

 

trouble

 
Plummer
 
services
 

conciliate

 

follow

 

revenge

 

employ

 

informed

 

wouldn


Simply

 
Coombs
 

interest

 

decide

 

friendly

 

Though

 

impartially

 

replied

 
eloquence
 
Clarence