FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  
endeavour to decompose this salt by nitric acid, which tends to combine with soda, we shall be equally unsuccessful, as nitric acid tends to unite with the alkali by a force equal only to 7. In neither of these cases of simple elective attraction, therefore, can we accomplish our purpose. But let us previously combine together the lime and nitric acid, so as to form a nitrat of lime, a compound salt, the constituents of which are united by a power equal to 4. If then we present this compound to the sulphat of soda, a decomposition will ensue, because the sum of the forces which tend to preserve the two salts in their actual state is not equal to that of the forces which tend to decompose them, and to form new combinations. The nitric acid, therefore, will combine with the soda, and the sulphuric acid with the lime. CAROLINE. I understand you now very well. This double effect takes place because the numbers 8 and 4, which represent the degrees of attraction of the constituents of the two original salts, make a sum less than the numbers 7 and 6, which represent the degrees of attraction of the two new compounds that will in consequence be formed. MRS. B. Precisely so. CAROLINE. But what is the meaning of _quiescent_ and _divellent_ forces, which are written in the diagram? MRS. B. Quiescent forces are those which tend to preserve compounds in a state of rest, or such as they actually are: divellent forces, those which tend to destroy that state of combination, and to form new compounds. These are the principal circumstances relative to the doctrine of chemical attractions, which have been laid down as rules by modern chemists; a few others might be mentioned respecting the same theory, but of less importance, and such as would take us too far from our plan. I should, however, not omit to mention that Mr. Berthollet, a celebrated French chemist, has questioned the uniform operation of elective attraction, and has advanced the opinion, that, in chemical combinations, the changes which take place depend not only upon the affinities, but also, in some degree, on the respective quantities of the substances concerned, on the heat applied during the process, and some other circumstances. CAROLINE. In that case, I suppose, there would hardly be two compounds exactly similar, though composed of the same materials? MRS. B. On the contrary, it is found that a remarkable uniformity prevails, as to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200  
201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

forces

 

compounds

 

attraction

 

nitric

 

combine

 

CAROLINE

 
numbers
 
divellent
 

represent

 

degrees


combinations

 

decompose

 

preserve

 

elective

 

circumstances

 

chemical

 

compound

 

constituents

 

mention

 
chemists

Berthollet

 

modern

 

celebrated

 

French

 

respecting

 

theory

 

importance

 

mentioned

 
degree
 

similar


suppose

 

process

 

composed

 

remarkable

 

uniformity

 
contrary
 

materials

 

applied

 

depend

 

opinion


advanced

 
questioned
 

uniform

 

operation

 

affinities

 

substances

 
concerned
 

quantities

 

respective

 
prevails