ought to have been."
Another witness testified that the affray took place between Dunlap and
Capehart; that Dunlap handled Capehart very roughly, kicking him, etc.,
and that finally Capehart stabbed Dunlap, upon which the latter
attempted to get his gun, but was prevented from doing so by the
witness.
Of course there can be no pretense of any kind of claim against the
Government arising from these facts.
It is quite evident that the affidavit presented to the Senate committee
was contrived to deceive, and it is to be feared that it is but a sample
of many that are made in support of claims for pensions.
GROVER CLEVELAND.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, _February 3, 1887_.
_To the House of Representatives_:
I return without approval House bill No. 6443, entitled "An act granting
a pension to Alexander Falconer."
This claimant filed his application for pension in 1879, alleging that
in 1837, being then an enlisted man in the United States Army, he
received a gunshot wound in his right leg below the knee at the battle
of Okeechobee Lake, Florida.
The records disclose the fact that this soldier enlisted in 1834, and
was almost continuously in the service and attached to the same company
until 1846.
It further appears that he is reported sick during the month in which
the battle was fought. The list of casualties does not contain his name
among the wounded.
He reenlisted in 1846 and again in 1847, and was finally discharged in
1848. These latter enlistments were for service in the Mexican War.
His claim for pension was denied in 1885 on the ground that no
disability existed in a pensionable degree from the alleged gunshot
wound in his leg.
It is perfectly clear that the only pretexts for giving this claimant a
pension are military service, old age, and poverty.
Inasmuch as he was a soldier in the Mexican War, his case is undoubtedly
provided for by a general law approved within the last few days.
Under this bill the amount to be paid him is fixed, while if the bill
herewith returned were approved the sum to be paid him would depend
upon the determination of the Pension Bureau as to the extent of his
disability as the result of his wound. As that Bureau has quite lately
determined that there was no disability, it is evident that this old
soldier can better rely upon the general law referred to.
GROVER CLEVELAND.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, _February 3, 1887_.
_To the House of Representatives_:
|