as to the cause of this precipitate
departure. Not improbable is the suggestion that Charles often
overstepped the bounds of courtesy towards his followers. Once, so
runs one story, he found the historian sleeping on his bed where he
had flung himself while awaiting his master. Charles pulled off one of
his boots "to give him more ease" and struck him in the face with it.
In derision the courtiers called Commines _tete bottee_, and their
mocking sank deep into his soul.
Contemporary writers make little of the chronicler's defection.
These crossings from the peer's to the king's camp were accepted
occurrences. But by Charles they were not accepted. There is
a vindictive look about the hour when he disposes of his late
confidant's possessions, only explicable by intense indignation not
itemised in the deed approved by the court of Mons.[38]
More loyal was that other chronicler, Olivier de la Marche, though to
him, also, came intimations that he would find a pleasant welcome at
the French court. He, too, had opportunities galore to make links with
Louis. The accounts teem with references to his secret missions
here and there, and with mention of the rewards paid, all carefully
itemised. So zealous was this messenger on his master's commissions,
that his hackneys were ruined by his fast riding and had to be sold
for petty sums. The keen eye of Louis XI. was not blind to the quality
of La Marche's services, and he thought that they, too, might be
diverted to his use.[39]
"Monsieur du Bouchage, Guillaume de Thouars has told me that
Messire Olivier de la Marche is willing to enter my service and
I am afraid that there may be some deception. However, there is
nothing that I would like better than to have the said Sieur
de Cimay, as you know. Therefore, pray find out how the matter
stands, and if you see that it is in good earnest work for it with
all diligence. Whatever you pledge I will hold to. Advise me of
everything.
"Written at Clery, October 16th [1472].
"To our beloved and faithful councillor and chancellor, Sire du
Bouchage."[40]
But La Marche was not tempted, and was rewarded for his fidelity
by high office in a duchy which, shortly after these events, was
"annexed" to his master's domain.
[Footnote 1: _Journal de Jean de Roye_, i., 258.]
[Footnote 2: Commynes-Dupont, iii., 202.]
[Footnote 3: Plancher, iv., cccvi., May 28th.]
[Footnote 4: Rymer, _Foed
|