he letters of convocation bear the date February 26,
1467, o.s. Tournay elected four deputies. By April 30th, they had
returned home, and on May 2d they made a report. The items of
expenditure are very exact. So hard had they ridden that a fine horse
costing eleven crowns was used up and was sold for four crowns. M. Van
der Broeck, archivist of Tournay, extracted various items from the
register of the Council. _See_ Kervyn's note. Chastellain, v., 387.]
[Footnote 3: _See_ Lavisse iv^[ii]., 356.]
[Footnote 4: Dordrecht was not among them. Her deputies held that
it was illegal for them to go to The Hague. Some time later Charles
received the oaths at Dordrecht. (Wagenaar, _Vaderlandsche Hist._,
iv., 101.]
[Footnote 5: Treaty of Ancenis, September 10, 1468. _See_ Lavisse,
iv^[ii].] One of the results of the War of Public Weal was that St.
Pol was appointed constable of France.]
[Footnote 6: The original is in the Mss. de Baluze, Paris, Bibl. Nat.;
Lenglet, iii., 19.]
[Footnote 7: Commines and a letter to the magistrates of Ypres are the
basis of this narrative. (Gachard, _Doc. ined._, i., 196.) There
is, however, a mass of additional material both contemporaneous and
commentating. _See also_ Michelet, Lavisse, Kirk, etc. Chastellain's
MS. is lost.]
[Footnote 8: _See_ Lavisse, iv^[ii]., 397.]
[Footnote 9: Ludwig v. Diesbach, (_See_ Kirk, i., 559.) The author
was a page in Louis's train, who afterwards played a part in Swiss
affairs.]
[Footnote 10: It was never captured until Wellington took it in 1814.]
[Footnote 11: Commines, ii., ch. vii.]
[Footnote 12: The bishop did indeed meet his death at the hands of the
mob, but it was many years later.]
[Footnote 13: _Le roi ... se voyait loge, rasibus d'une grosse tour ou
un Comte de Vermandois fit mourir un sien predecesseur Roy de France_.
(Commines, ii., ch. vii.)]
[Footnote 14: _Memoires_, ii., ch. ix.]
[Footnote 15: Undoubtedly Commines wishes it to be inferred that this
was he. The main narrative followed here is Commines, whose memoirs
remain, as Ste.-Beuve says, the definitive history of the times. There
are the errors inevitable to any contemporary statement. Meyer, to be
sure, says, apropos of an incident incorrectly reported, _Falsus in
hoc ut in pluribus historicus_. Kervyn de Lettenhove three centuries
later is also severe. _See_, too, "L'autorite historique de Ph. de
Commynes," Mandrot, _Rev. Hist_., 73.]
[Footnote 16: Gachard, _Doc.
|