FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   >>  
L. How the question of prohibition is regarded by the highest legal authority in the United States will appear from the following opinions officially given by four of the Justices of our Supreme Court. They are expressed in no doubtful or hesitating form of speech: Chief Justice Taney said: "If any State deems the retail and internal traffic in ardent spirits injurious to its citizens, and calculated to produce idleness, vice or debauchery, I see nothing in the Constitution of the United States to prevent it from regulating or restraining the traffic, or from prohibiting it altogether, if it thinks proper."--[5 Howard, 577.] Hon. Justice McLean said: "A license to sell is a matter of police and revenue within the power of the State."--[5 Ibid., 589.] "If the foreign article be injurious to the health and morals of the community, a State may prohibit the sale of it." Hon. Justice Catron said: "If the State has the power of restraint by license to any extent, she may go to the length of prohibiting sales altogether."--[5 Ibid., 611.] Hon. Justice Grier said: "It is not necessary to array the appalling statistics of misery, pauperism and crime which have their origin in the use and abuse of ardent spirits. The police power, which is exclusively in the State, is competent to the correction of these great evils, and all measures of restraint or prohibition necessary to effect that purpose are within the scope of that authority."--[Ibid., 532.] That the State has a clear right to prohibit the sale of intoxicating drinks, because this sale not only hurts all other interests, but destroys the health and degrades the morals of the people, has been fully shown. The question next to be considered is, Can prohibitory laws be enforced? and if so, will they remove from the people the curse of drunkenness? CAN PROHIBITORY LAWS BE ENFORCED? As to the complete enforcement of any salutory law, that depends mainly on the public sentiment regarding it, and on the organized strength of its opposers. If the common sentiment of the people were in favor of every man's liberty to steal whatever he could lay his hands on, it would be found very difficult to convict a rogue, no matter how clearly expressed the law against stealing. A single thief in the jury-box could defeat the ends of justice. A hundred loop-holes for escape can always be found in the provisions of a law with which the majority of the people are not in sym
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   >>  



Top keywords:
people
 

Justice

 

prohibiting

 
sentiment
 

restraint

 

prohibit

 

morals

 

police

 

matter

 

injurious


health

 
license
 

altogether

 
States
 
expressed
 

prohibition

 

question

 

spirits

 

authority

 

traffic


ardent

 

United

 

PROHIBITORY

 

drunkenness

 

ENFORCED

 
enforcement
 

salutory

 

depends

 

complete

 

remove


provisions

 

enforced

 
destroys
 

degrades

 

interests

 

majority

 

prohibitory

 

considered

 

escape

 

liberty


difficult
 
convict
 

public

 

justice

 

hundred

 
defeat
 

opposers

 
stealing
 
common
 

single