FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>  
out any need to begin from a new intuition; that his view precludes all considerations of strictly spiritual life, of inner and profound action, regarding things in relation to God and in an eternal perspective: such a view would be illegitimate and unreasonable, first of all, because Mr Bergson has said nothing of the kind, and secondly, because it is contrary to all his tendencies. After the "Essay on the Immediate Data" critics proceeded to confine him in an irreducible static dualism; after "Matter and Memory" they condemned him as failing for ever to explain the juxtaposition of the two points of view, utility and truth: why should we require that after "Creative Evolution" he should be forbidden to think anything new, or distinguish, for example, different orders of life? The problems must be approached one after the other, and, in the solution of each of them, it is proper to introduce only the necessary elements. But each result is only "temporarily final." Let us lose the strange habit of asking an author continually to do something other than he has done, or, in what he has done, to give us the whole of his thought. Till now, Mr Bergson has always considered each new problem according to its specific and original nature, and, to solve it, he has always supplied a new effort of autonomous adaptation: why should it be otherwise for the future? I seek vainly for the decree forbidding him the right to study the problem of biological evolution in itself, and for the necessity which compels him to abide now by the premisses contained in his past work. (For Mr Bergson, the religious sentiment, as the sentiment of obligation, contains a basis of "immediate datum" rendering it indissoluble and irreducible.) The only point which we have to examine is this: will the moral and religious question compel Mr Bergson to break with the conclusions of his previous studies, and can we not, on the contrary, foresee points of general agreement? In the depths of ourselves we find liberty; in the depths of universal being we find a demand for creation. Since evolution is creative, each of its moments works for the production of an indeducible and transcendent future. This future must not be regarded as a simple development of the present, a simple expression of germs already given. Consequently we have no authority for saying that there is for ever only one order of life, only one plane of action, only one rhythm of dura
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   >>  



Top keywords:

Bergson

 

future

 

religious

 

irreducible

 

depths

 

contrary

 

sentiment

 

action

 
problem
 

simple


evolution

 

points

 

rendering

 

obligation

 

necessity

 

vainly

 

decree

 
adaptation
 

supplied

 

effort


autonomous
 

forbidding

 

premisses

 

contained

 

biological

 

compels

 

previous

 

regarded

 

development

 

present


expression

 

transcendent

 

indeducible

 
creative
 

moments

 
production
 

rhythm

 

Consequently

 

authority

 

creation


compel

 
conclusions
 
question
 
examine
 

nature

 

studies

 
liberty
 

universal

 

demand

 

foresee